were observed for

USAGE SUMMARY

'were observed for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the results of an observation that took place over a period of time. For example: “The effects of the new diet plan were observed for a period of 30 days.”.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Rats were observed for 24 hours.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The tubes were observed for gas formation.

Applied Water Science

Similar results were observed for LDH release.

Chemistry Central Journal

Results were observed for 72 h.

Chemistry Central Journal

The plates were observed for inhibition zones.

Applied Water Science

The plates were observed for fused colonies.

AMB Express

Halo patterns were observed for all samples.

Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Reconstruction artifacts were observed for all systems.

EJNMMI Research

No treatment effects were observed for digestion.

The Professional Animal Scientist

Similar results were observed for glutamate.

Brain Research Bulletin

The rats were observed for defecation.

Pathophysiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the subjects of the observation are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "the rats" or "the cells" instead of just "they".

Common error

Avoid using "were observed for" when an active voice construction would be more direct and clear. For example, instead of "Symptoms were observed for the patient", consider "Doctors observed symptoms in the patient".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were observed for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject underwent observation over a specified duration. Ludwig's examples show its common use in describing research and experimental procedures.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were observed for" is a grammatically sound passive construction primarily used to describe the act of monitoring subjects over a specified period. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in scientific and formal contexts, as indicated by its frequent usage in academic and research papers, this phrase conveys objectivity in reporting experimental procedures. Alternatives like "were monitored for" or "were examined for" can be used depending on the context. When using "were observed for", it’s important to clearly state the duration of the observation and identify the subjects to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were monitored for

This alternative focuses on the active monitoring of the subject.

were watched for

This alternative implies a more casual or less formal observation.

were tracked for

This suggests a continuous following or tracing of something over time.

were inspected for

This implies a detailed examination to detect specific issues or qualities.

were examined for

Similar to 'inspected,' but can also suggest a more formal or scientific investigation.

were assessed for

This focuses on evaluating or judging something based on specific criteria.

were checked for

Suggests a verification process to ensure a certain condition is met.

were surveyed for

Indicates a systematic collection and analysis of data.

were screened for

This implies a preliminary examination to identify potential issues.

were tested for

This alternative means that certain tests were performed on them.

FAQs

How can I use "were observed for" in a sentence?

Use "were observed for" to describe the act of monitoring something over a specific period. For instance, "The reactions "were observed for" any changes during the experiment."

What are some alternatives to "were observed for"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "were monitored for", "were examined for", or "were tracked for".

Is "were observed for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "were observed for" is grammatically correct. It's a passive construction commonly used in scientific and formal writing.

What's the difference between ""were observed for"" and "were observing"?

"Were observed for" indicates a passive observation over a duration, while "were observing" indicates an active, ongoing observation at a specific time.