were not provided

USAGE SUMMARY

'were not provided' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was not given or supplied. For example: The required materials for the project were not provided.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Financial details were not provided.

The New York Times

Financial terms were not provided.

The New York Times

Other details were not provided.

The New York Times

Earnings per share were not provided.

The New York Times

Specifics were not provided about individual properties.

The New York Times

Specific cost estimates were not provided.

The Washington Post

They were not provided with any such safety.

The Guardian

The names of the generic companies were not provided.

The New York Times - Health

In addition, the two Macs that were present were not provided through standard Infosys support.

Harvard University

In too many cases, these services were not provided in a meaningful way.

The New York Times

Details were not provided.

International Journal of STEM Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were not provided", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was expected to be provided. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was not provided" when referring to plural subjects. Always use "were not provided" when the subject is plural to maintain correct grammatical agreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were not provided" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was not given, supplied, or made available. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

32%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were not provided" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for indicating that something was absent or not supplied. As Ludwig AI validates, it is suitable for various contexts, ranging from scientific reports to news articles. While versatile, pay attention to subject-verb agreement (plural subjects require "were") and consider the level of formality desired when choosing alternatives like "were not furnished" or "were not given". The phrase sees greatest use in Scientific and News contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were not supplied

Synonymous, replacing "provided" with "supplied" maintains the original meaning with a slight shift in vocabulary.

were not given

A more direct and simpler alternative, focusing on the act of giving rather than the arrangement of provision.

were not furnished

"Furnished" implies a more formal or official provision, making it suitable for contexts involving equipment or resources.

were not made available

Emphasizes the lack of accessibility or opportunity to obtain something.

were not offered

Highlights the absence of an offer or invitation to receive something.

were not allocated

Suggests that resources were not assigned or distributed for a specific purpose.

were not delivered

Implies a failure in the process of delivering or conveying something.

were not granted

Conveys that permission or authorization was withheld.

were absent

A concise way to state that something was missing or not present.

were lacking

Similar to "were absent", but emphasizes a deficiency or need.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "were not provided" to sound more formal?

You can use alternatives such as "were not furnished" or "were not made available" in more formal contexts.

What's a simpler way to say "were not provided"?

A simpler way to say "were not provided" is "were not given". This is suitable for less formal communication.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "were not provided"?

"Were not provided" is appropriate in various contexts where something expected or required was absent. This includes formal reports, academic papers, and news articles.

What is the difference between "were not provided" and "were not supplied"?

While both phrases are similar, "were not supplied" often implies a more logistical or material context, whereas "were not provided" can encompass both material and immaterial provisions.