Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were not mentioned
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were not mentioned" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something was not included or referred to in a previous discussion or text. Example: "The key points of the meeting were not mentioned in the summary provided."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Miracles were not mentioned.
News & Media
They were not mentioned.
News & Media
The police were not mentioned.
News & Media
Fine arts were not mentioned.
News & Media
The mittens were not mentioned.
News & Media
Those factors were not mentioned in Eisentrager.
Academia
Just some thoughts that were not mentioned.
Academia
Moon and religion were not mentioned.
News & Media
Complications from the surgery were not mentioned.
Science & Research
Once again, videotapes were not mentioned.
News & Media
Corporate governance issues were not mentioned.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were not mentioned" to clearly indicate that certain topics or details were absent from a particular discussion, document, or report. This helps highlight omissions and potential gaps in information.
Common error
Avoid stringing together multiple passive constructions in a single sentence. While "were not mentioned" is grammatically sound, overuse can make your writing sound weak and convoluted. Aim for a balance with active voice constructions to improve clarity and impact.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were not mentioned" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject did not receive attention in a specific context. It is used to highlight omissions or absences of information, as shown by Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Science
33%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were not mentioned" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to highlight omissions in various contexts. According to Ludwig, it appears frequently in news, scientific, and academic writing, serving the purpose of pointing out what has been overlooked or excluded. While generally neutral in register, careful attention should be paid to avoid overuse of passive voice, maintaining clear and impactful writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were not referenced
Emphasizes the absence of a specific citation or source.
were not included
Highlights the exclusion of something from a list or collection.
were not discussed
Focuses on the lack of conversation or debate about a particular topic.
were not covered
Suggests the topic wasn't addressed or examined in detail.
were not addressed
Indicates the topic was avoided or left unresolved.
were not touched upon
Signifies a light or brief mentioning, which did not happen.
were not detailed
Focuses on the absence of elaboration or specific information.
were not specified
Emphasizes the lack of explicit details or instructions.
were overlooked
Suggests something was missed or ignored unintentionally.
were omitted
Highlights the deliberate exclusion of something.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "were not mentioned" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "were not referenced", "were not addressed", or "were not detailed", depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "was not mentioned" instead of "were not mentioned"?
Yes, but the choice depends on the subject's number. Use "was not mentioned" for singular subjects and "were not mentioned" for plural subjects. For example, "The issue was not mentioned", versus "The issues were not mentioned".
What is the difference between "were not mentioned" and "were omitted"?
"Were not mentioned" simply indicates that something wasn't brought up. "Were omitted" suggests a deliberate act of leaving something out.
What are some common contexts where "were not mentioned" is typically used?
"Were not mentioned" is commonly used in reports, reviews, and summaries to highlight information that was absent from the original source. It's also used in discussions and analyses to point out topics that were overlooked or ignored.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested