Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were not found

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were not found" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when speaking about something that was searched for but wasn't located. Example: After an extensive search of the property, the missing items were not found.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Ghrelin cells were not found.

*3 or *4 alleles were not found.

Science & Research

Nature

Diazinon and other pesticides were not found.

News & Media

The New York Times

But the youths were not found.

News & Media

The New York Times

Their three companions were not found.

News & Media

The New York Times

Significant differences in BP were not found.

Highly reliable tests were not found until mid-1992.

News & Media

The New York Times

Many were not found until the damage had been done.

News & Media

The New York Times

The drugs were not found on the school premises.

News & Media

The Times

These structures were not found with a monoclonal antibody.

Science & Research

Nature

The cortisol differences were not found in the men studied.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were not found", ensure the subject is plural. For a singular subject, use "was not found".

Common error

Avoid using "were not found" with singular subjects. The correct form for a singular subject is "was not found". Example: The key was not found.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were not found" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subjects were the recipients of the action of finding. It is commonly used to report the outcome of a search or investigation, as shown in examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were not found" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction to indicate that a search for something (plural) yielded no results. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It is suitable for various contexts, including scientific, news, and formal writing. It's important to maintain subject-verb agreement by using "was not found" for singular subjects. Alternative phrases like "could not be located" or "remained undetected" can be used for variety. Remember always to verify that the subject is plural.

FAQs

What is the difference between "was not found" and "were not found"?

"Was not found" is used with a singular subject, while "were not found" is used with plural subjects. For example, "The book was not found" versus "The books were not found".

What can I say instead of "were not found"?

You can use alternatives like "could not be located", "remained undetected", or "proved elusive" depending on the context.

How to use "were not found" in a sentence?

Use "were not found" to indicate that something plural could not be located. For example: "The missing files were not found on the server".

Is it correct to say "was not found" instead of "were not found"?

It depends on the subject. "Was not found" is for singular subjects, while "were not found" is for plural subjects. Always ensure subject-verb agreement.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: