Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were not fooled
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were not fooled" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone was not deceived or tricked by a situation or statement. Example: "Despite the elaborate scheme, we were not fooled by their attempts to mislead us."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
20 human-written examples
They were not fooled.
News & Media
The judges were not fooled.
News & Media
The coyotes were not fooled.
News & Media
The spirits were not fooled.
News & Media
Evidently, the voters were not fooled.
News & Media
But the American people were not fooled.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
36 human-written examples
Consumers weren't fooled.
News & Media
But bookstores weren't fooled.
News & Media
But Australians weren't fooled.
News & Media
But his fans weren't fooled.
News & Media
But consumers weren't fooled.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "were not fooled", ensure that the subject clearly identifies who was not deceived and that the context makes clear what they were not deceived by. For example, "The experienced investigators were not fooled by the suspect's alibi."
Common error
Avoid using "were not fooled by themselves". The passive voice already implies that someone or something else did the fooling. Adding "by themselves" creates a redundant and grammatically awkward construction.
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were not fooled" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence was the recipient of an action (an attempt to deceive) but was not successfully deceived. Ludwig examples confirm its use in describing situations where deception failed.
Frequent in
News & Media
95%
Formal & Business
2%
Wiki
1%
Less common in
Science
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were not fooled" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that someone was not deceived. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Its neutral register and widespread use in news and media sources, like The New York Times and The Guardian, underscore its versatility. While "were not deceived" offers a more formal alternative, "were not fooled" effectively communicates the discernment of the subject in recognizing and resisting deception. The prevalence of this phrase suggests its importance in conveying transparency and awareness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were not deceived
Replaces "fooled" with a more formal synonym, "deceived".
were not tricked
Substitutes "fooled" with "tricked", another common synonym.
were not misled
Replaces "fooled" with "misled", emphasizing the act of being guided wrongly.
were not duped
Substitutes "fooled" with "duped", suggesting a cunning deception attempt.
were not hoodwinked
Replaces "fooled" with "hoodwinked", indicating a clever and deceptive trick.
saw through
Uses a phrasal verb to convey the idea of understanding a deception.
were not taken in
Employs a passive construction with "taken in" to express the lack of deception.
were not bamboozled
Substitutes "fooled" with "bamboozled", implying a confusing and misleading deception.
were not conned
Replaces "fooled" with "conned", suggesting a fraudulent scheme.
remained unconvinced
Shifts the focus to a lack of belief rather than direct deception.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "were not fooled" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "were not deceived", "remained unconvinced", or "were not misled". These options offer a more sophisticated and professional tone.
What does "were not fooled" mean?
The phrase "were not fooled" means that someone or a group of people did not believe a lie or deception. They recognized the truth despite attempts to mislead them.
How to use "were not fooled" in a sentence?
You can use "were not fooled" to indicate that someone recognized a deception attempt. For example, "The jury "were not fooled" by the defendant's emotional testimony".
Is it correct to say "was not fooled" instead of "were not fooled"?
The correct form depends on the subject's number. Use "was not fooled" for singular subjects (e.g., "He was not fooled") and ""were not fooled"" for plural subjects (e.g., "They were not fooled").
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested