Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were not available
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'were not available' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was not available for someone to do or have. For example: "The necessary tools were not available for the task, so we had to find other means of completing the project."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Sports
Alternative expressions(20)
could not be accessed
were missing
were absent
were lacking
were out of stock
is unavailable
are unavailable
were not accessible
were not in supply
do not exist
were sold out
were unavailable for purchase
were exhausted
were already closed
had been shut
were no longer open
had been terminated
had been deactivated
were not insured
were not profitable
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Terms were not available.
News & Media
Results were not available.
News & Media
Further details were not available.
News & Media
Rosneft representatives were not available.
News & Media
Condominium prices were not available.
News & Media
Revenue figures were not available.
News & Media
More details were not available.
News & Media
Additional details were not available.
News & Media
Unfortunately, senior MIT faculty were not available.
News & Media
Google executives were not available for comment.
News & Media
Final numbers were not available Monday.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were not available", ensure clarity by specifying what was unavailable and why. This provides context and prevents ambiguity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "were not available" without clearly specifying what the subject is. For example, instead of saying "Details were not available", specify "Further details about the incident were not available" to provide better context.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were not available" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating the absence or inaccessibility of something. It is commonly used to report that information, resources, or individuals could not be accessed or obtained at a particular time. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
News & Media
75%
Formal & Business
10%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Science
3%
Reference
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were not available" is a grammatically sound and very common expression used to indicate that something was inaccessible or unobtainable. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability. Predominantly found in news and media, as well as formal business contexts, it serves to inform the audience about the absence or lack of accessibility of specific items or information. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify what "were not available" to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "were inaccessible" or "could not be obtained" can be used depending on the context and desired level of formality.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were inaccessible
This alternative directly replaces "available" with "inaccessible", maintaining a similar level of formality and meaning.
were unobtainable
Similar to "inaccessible", "unobtainable" emphasizes the impossibility of getting or achieving something.
could not be accessed
This alternative uses a more formal tone and emphasizes the inability to gain access.
were out of reach
This phrase uses a more figurative expression to convey that something could not be accessed or obtained.
could not be obtained
This option focuses on the impossibility of acquiring something, maintaining a formal tone.
were missing
This indicates that something was absent or not present when needed.
were absent
A more formal synonym for "missing", suggesting a lack of presence.
were lacking
This implies a deficiency or absence, suggesting the needed resources or information did not exist.
were non-existent
This phrase emphasizes the complete lack of existence of something.
were not to be had
This idiom suggests that something was impossible to get, often due to circumstances or unavailability.
FAQs
How can I use "were not available" in a sentence?
You can use "were not available" to indicate that something was not accessible or obtainable at a specific time. For example, "Tickets "were not available" for the concert" or "The data "were not available" at the time of the report".
What is a more formal alternative to "were not available"?
More formal alternatives include "were inaccessible", "could not be obtained", or "were unobtainable". These options provide a more sophisticated tone suitable for professional or academic writing.
Is it grammatically correct to say "was not available" instead of "were not available"?
The correct form depends on the subject. Use "was not available" for singular subjects (e.g., "The document was not available"), and use "were not available" for plural subjects (e.g., "The documents "were not available"").
What's the difference between "were not available" and "were unavailable"?
"Were not available" and "were unavailable" are largely interchangeable. "Unavailable" is a more concise, single-word alternative to "were not available", but both convey the same meaning.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested