were known for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were known for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a reputation or characteristic associated with someone or something in the past. Example: "The ancient civilization were known for their advanced architectural techniques and impressive monuments."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We were known for always drawing.

The New York Times

You were known for your fierce determination.

The New York Times

The Wallaces were known for coddling employees.

The New York Times

The Prairie View Coeds were known for improvising.

The New York Times - Books

His ads were known for their compelling story lines.

The New York Times

Ukrainians were known for being terrible to the Jews.

The New Yorker

Under Kevin Keegan, Newcastle were known for their cavalier football.

The Guardian - Sport

Denominations that were known for revivalistic fervour became subdued.

Britannica

His bands were known for swing and Dixieland sounds.

The New York Times - Arts

As places to meet, they were known for their clientele.

The Washington Post

His legal briefs were known for their strength and eloquence.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were known for" to highlight a specific and widely recognized attribute or achievement. Avoid using it for obscure or debatable qualities.

Common error

Avoid using "were known for" to describe current qualities or activities. This phrase implies a past reputation, not a present one. Instead, use "are known for" if the attribute is still applicable today.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were known for" functions as a linking verb combined with a passive participle, indicating a past reputation or characteristic attributed to a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its standard usage, showcasing its role in establishing historical or past associations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were known for" is a versatile construction used to denote past reputations or characteristics, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It's grammatically sound and frequently appears in diverse sources, especially in news, encyclopedias, and general writing. Understanding its correct tense usage and choosing appropriate alternatives can enhance clarity and precision in writing. When using "were known for", ensure the historical context is clear, and avoid applying it to current attributes. Its widespread usage and semantic clarity make it a valuable phrase in effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were recognized for

Focuses on acknowledgment or formal recognition of specific qualities or achievements.

were famous for

Emphasizes widespread recognition and popularity regarding certain attributes.

were celebrated for

Highlights positive attributes and public praise.

were distinguished by

Focuses on unique or notable aspects that set something apart.

were notable for

Highlights significant or remarkable aspects.

had a reputation for

Indicates an established public perception, which might be positive or negative.

were regarded for

Focuses on how something was viewed or considered by others.

were identified by

Emphasizes specific attributes used to recognize or categorize something.

were characterized by

Highlights key traits or features that define something.

were defined by

Focuses on essential qualities that determine the nature or identity of something.

FAQs

How can I use "were known for" in a sentence?

Use "were known for" to describe a past reputation or characteristic of a person, place, or thing. For example, "The Incas "were known for" their intricate road system".

What is a good alternative to "were known for"?

Alternatives include "were famous for", "were recognized for", or "had a reputation for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "were known for" for something that is still true today?

No, "were known for" implies a past condition. If something is still true today, use "are known for" instead. The shift in tense is crucial for accuracy.

What's the difference between "were known for" and "are known for"?

"Were known for" refers to a past reputation or characteristic, while "are known for" describes a current reputation or characteristic. The tense indicates whether the attribute is still valid.