Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were just as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were just as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare two subjects or situations, indicating that they are equal in some way. Example: "The results of the experiment were just as surprising as we had anticipated."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
But newer realities were just as important.
News & Media
The suggested remedies were just as diverse.
News & Media
Many other objects were just as strange.
News & Media
Expenses were just as painful.
News & Media
They were just as bad.
News & Media
People in Paris were just as surprised.
News & Media
American ambiguities were just as evident.
News & Media
Other councils were just as bad.
News & Media
Citigroup's motivations were just as great.
News & Media
The major characters were just as responsible.
News & Media
The other Americans were just as excited.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were just as", ensure that you are comparing like qualities or attributes between two subjects for clarity and impact.
Common error
Avoid using "were just as" when not making a direct comparison. For instance, saying "They were just as" without specifying what they are comparable to leads to an incomplete thought.
Source & Trust
92%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were just as" primarily functions as a comparative construction. It serves to equate two or more subjects based on a shared attribute or characteristic. Ludwig confirms the phrase's correct usage, as demonstrated by the numerous examples provided.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were just as" is a grammatically sound and commonly used comparative expression. Ludwig's examples showcase its wide applicability, particularly in news and media. The phrase effectively emphasizes the similarity between two subjects, making it a valuable tool for clear and impactful writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct, so use it with confidence when you want to draw a comparison.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were equally
Replaces "just as" with "equally", emphasizing the equal nature of the comparison.
were as
Omits "just", resulting in a slightly less emphatic comparison, focusing on equivalence.
were simply as
Substitutes "just" with "simply", softening the emphasis on equality.
were virtually the same
Shifts from direct comparison to highlighting near identity.
were practically identical
Emphasizes a very high degree of similarity, bordering on indistinguishable.
were of equal
Focuses on the equivalence in terms of a specific attribute or quality.
were on par
Highlights the equivalence in terms of level or standard.
were comparable
Indicates a degree of similarity that allows for comparison.
were analogous
Suggests a similarity based on a relationship or structure.
were much the same
Emphasizes a broad similarity, focusing on overall likeness.
FAQs
How can I use "were just as" in a sentence?
Use "were just as" to compare two things that have similar qualities or characteristics. For example, "The challenges we faced then "were just as" difficult as the ones we face now".
What phrases are similar to "were just as"?
Phrases with similar meaning include "were equally", "were as", and "were comparable".
Is "were just as good" grammatically correct?
Yes, "were just as good" is grammatically correct. It is used to indicate that two or more things are equal in quality. For example, "The sequels "were just as" good as the original movie".
What's the difference between "were just as" and "were as"?
"Were just as" emphasizes the equivalence more strongly than "were as". "Just" adds a level of emphasis. The sentence "They "were just as" happy" implies a greater degree of happiness compared to "They "were as" happy".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
92%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested