Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were in agreement

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'were in agreement' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you have two or more people who have come to an accord, or a consensus. For example: After a long discussion, the board of directors were in agreement about the new policy.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And we were in agreement.

News & Media

The New York Times

Most were in agreement.

We were in agreement".

The voices, too, were in agreement.

But as it turned out, they were in agreement.

News & Media

The New York Times

If everyone were in agreement it wouldn't probably be art".

News & Media

The New York Times

The men's minds and genitals were in agreement.

The two managers were in agreement, for now.

All were in agreement: This was the one.

News & Media

The New York Times

Republicans were in agreement with Democrats on the issue.

News & Media

The New York Times

The critics were in agreement.

News & Media

BBC
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Vary your language by using synonyms like "were in accord" or "reached a consensus" to avoid repetition and enhance the flow of your writing.

Common error

Ensure that the subject of the phrase is plural. It is incorrect to say "he were in agreement"; the correct form is "he was in agreement" or, for multiple subjects, "they were in agreement".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were in agreement" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, describing the state of the subject as being in accord or having a consensus. It expresses a shared understanding or opinion among multiple parties, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were in agreement" effectively communicates a state of consensus or shared understanding. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use across various domains. It is particularly prevalent in science and news reporting. Remember to ensure subject-verb agreement and consider using synonyms like "were in accord" or "reached a consensus" to add variety to your writing. By using this phrase correctly, you can clearly and concisely convey that multiple parties hold the same viewpoint or have come to a mutual understanding.

FAQs

What does "were in agreement" mean?

The phrase "were in agreement" means that two or more people or entities shared the same opinion or reached a consensus on a particular matter. It indicates a state of accord or mutual understanding.

How can I use "were in agreement" in a sentence?

You can use "were in agreement" to describe a situation where multiple parties have the same viewpoint. For example: "After a lengthy discussion, the committee "were in agreement" on the proposed changes."

What are some alternatives to "were in agreement"?

Alternatives include "were in accord", "reached a consensus", or "saw eye to eye". The best alternative depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "were in agreement" formal or informal?

"Were in agreement" is generally considered a neutral phrase suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, in very formal settings, you might opt for alternatives like "were in accordance" or "concurred".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: