Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were fundamentally
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were fundamentally" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the essential nature or underlying principles of something in the past. Example: "The theories proposed by the scientists were fundamentally flawed, leading to incorrect conclusions."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
"They were fundamentally sound.
News & Media
Such ties were fundamentally personal in nature.
Encyclopedias
We know the Macedonians were fundamentally Greeks.
Academia
So there were, fundamentally, two competing views of Simenon.
News & Media
But Abbott claimed the two cases were "fundamentally different".
News & Media
Yet the jobs they were doing were fundamentally the same.
News & Media
"I don't think the helmets were fundamentally a problem.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
4 human-written examples
"That's fundamentally flawed".
News & Media
We're fundamentally hampered".
News & Media
It is fundamentally unfair".
News & Media
Saul was fundamentally sound.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were fundamentally" to emphasize the underlying nature or essential characteristic of something in the past. It adds weight to your statement and highlights the core aspect you're describing.
Common error
Avoid using "were fundamentally" when a simpler phrase like "were basically" or "were essentially" would suffice. Overusing complex phrasing can make your writing sound pretentious.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were fundamentally" functions as an adverbial modifier, specifically emphasizing the underlying or essential nature of a subject in the past. Ludwig examples show it qualifying adjectives or entire clauses to highlight a core characteristic.
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Academia
26%
Science
23%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were fundamentally" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that serves to emphasize the essential nature or underlying principles of a subject in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its strong presence across news, academic, and scientific sources signifies its versatility in formal and neutral contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects the core aspect you intend to highlight, and remain mindful of potential alternatives for situations where a less emphatic expression might be more appropriate. This careful consideration ensures clarity and precision in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were essentially
Emphasizes the basic or intrinsic nature, similar to "were fundamentally" but with a slightly different nuance.
were basically
Indicates the main or essential point, closely related to "were fundamentally" but more informal.
were intrinsically
Highlights the inherent quality or nature of something, offering a more formal alternative to "were fundamentally".
were at heart
Focuses on the core or central aspect, providing a more figurative alternative.
were in essence
Stresses the essential nature of something, similar in meaning but slightly more formal.
were primarily
Indicates the main or chief aspect, offering a slightly different focus than "were fundamentally".
were chiefly
Highlights the principal or most important element, similar to "were primarily".
were at their core
Emphasizes the central or most important part, providing a more descriptive alternative.
were in their nature
Focuses on the inherent characteristics, offering a more direct and simple alternative.
were at the root
Highlights the origin or cause, providing a slightly different perspective than "were fundamentally".
FAQs
How do I use "were fundamentally" in a sentence?
Use "were fundamentally" to describe the essential nature or underlying principles of something in the past. For example, "The issues "were fundamentally" different from what we expected."
What can I say instead of "were fundamentally"?
You can use alternatives like "were essentially", "were basically", or "were intrinsically" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "was fundamentally" instead of "were fundamentally"?
No, "was fundamentally" is used with singular subjects, while "were fundamentally" is used with plural subjects. For example, "The problem "was fundamentally" different," but "The problems "were fundamentally" different."
What's the difference between "were fundamentally" and "are fundamentally"?
"Were fundamentally" refers to something that was true in the past, while "are fundamentally" refers to something that is true in the present. For example, "The rules "were fundamentally" different in the past, but now they "are fundamentally" the same."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested