Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were fundamentally

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were fundamentally" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the essential nature or underlying principles of something in the past. Example: "The theories proposed by the scientists were fundamentally flawed, leading to incorrect conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"They were fundamentally sound.

Such ties were fundamentally personal in nature.

We know the Macedonians were fundamentally Greeks.

So there were, fundamentally, two competing views of Simenon.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But Abbott claimed the two cases were "fundamentally different".

News & Media

The Guardian

Yet the jobs they were doing were fundamentally the same.

"I don't think the helmets were fundamentally a problem.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

"That's fundamentally flawed".

News & Media

The New York Times

We're fundamentally hampered".

News & Media

The New York Times

It is fundamentally unfair".

News & Media

The New York Times

Saul was fundamentally sound.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were fundamentally" to emphasize the underlying nature or essential characteristic of something in the past. It adds weight to your statement and highlights the core aspect you're describing.

Common error

Avoid using "were fundamentally" when a simpler phrase like "were basically" or "were essentially" would suffice. Overusing complex phrasing can make your writing sound pretentious.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were fundamentally" functions as an adverbial modifier, specifically emphasizing the underlying or essential nature of a subject in the past. Ludwig examples show it qualifying adjectives or entire clauses to highlight a core characteristic.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

26%

Science

23%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were fundamentally" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that serves to emphasize the essential nature or underlying principles of a subject in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its strong presence across news, academic, and scientific sources signifies its versatility in formal and neutral contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects the core aspect you intend to highlight, and remain mindful of potential alternatives for situations where a less emphatic expression might be more appropriate. This careful consideration ensures clarity and precision in your writing.

FAQs

How do I use "were fundamentally" in a sentence?

Use "were fundamentally" to describe the essential nature or underlying principles of something in the past. For example, "The issues "were fundamentally" different from what we expected."

What can I say instead of "were fundamentally"?

You can use alternatives like "were essentially", "were basically", or "were intrinsically" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was fundamentally" instead of "were fundamentally"?

No, "was fundamentally" is used with singular subjects, while "were fundamentally" is used with plural subjects. For example, "The problem "was fundamentally" different," but "The problems "were fundamentally" different."

What's the difference between "were fundamentally" and "are fundamentally"?

"Were fundamentally" refers to something that was true in the past, while "are fundamentally" refers to something that is true in the present. For example, "The rules "were fundamentally" different in the past, but now they "are fundamentally" the same."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: