Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were found to have

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were found to have" is a correct and usable expression in written English.
You can use it whenever something has been discovered to possess certain qualities or attributes. For example: The students' essays were found to have excellent structure and grammar.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

All were found to have teratomas.

News & Media

The New York Times

None were found to have the disease.

News & Media

The New York Times

Trading profits were found to have been overstated by £326m.

These were found to have poor activity.

Fifteen patients were found to have proximal ureteral stone.

FEM patients were found to have lower FSIQ than HCs.

Workers were found to have marked degree of pallor.

Twentypercentt of children were found to have intracranial extension.

No children were found to have associated intracranial anomalies.

Thirty patients (20%) were found to have CHD.

The natural subregions were found to have distinct FRI distributions.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were found to have" to objectively report findings or discoveries. Ensure the subject of the phrase is clearly defined and the characteristic being described is accurately represented.

Common error

Avoid using "were found to have" when an active voice would be more direct and clear. For example, instead of "The errors were found to have been caused by a software bug", consider "A software bug caused the errors."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were found to have" functions as a passive reporting verb. It indicates that something was discovered or determined to possess a certain quality or characteristic. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were found to have" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to report discoveries or identified characteristics. As Ludwig AI confirms, its versatility allows for use in various contexts, though it's particularly prevalent in scientific and formal writing. While direct alternatives such as "were discovered to possess" exist, the choice depends on the desired level of formality and specific nuance. When using this phrase, remember to consider whether an active voice would improve clarity. Considering its frequent presence in scientific sources, adopting the alternatives indicated on Ludwig may result in a more concise and impactful writing style.

FAQs

How can I use "were found to have" in a sentence?

You can use "were found to have" to report discoveries or characteristics identified through investigation or analysis. For example, "The patients "were found to have" a rare genetic mutation".

What are some alternatives to "were found to have"?

Alternatives include "were discovered to possess", "were identified as having", or "were determined to exhibit" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were found to have"?

While "were found to have" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and concise. Consider whether rephrasing the sentence in the active voice improves clarity.

In what contexts is "were found to have" most appropriate?

"Were found to have" is suitable for formal and scientific writing when reporting results of studies or investigations. In more informal contexts, a simpler phrasing might be preferable.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: