Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were extracted from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were extracted from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information, data, or materials that have been taken or obtained from a source. Example: "The statistics presented in the report were extracted from a comprehensive survey conducted last year."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Wedding rings were extracted from a Cracker Jack box.
News & Media
Many prisoners have complained that confessions were extracted from them under duress.
News & Media
The hormones in early birth control pills were extracted from natural sources, usually Mexican yams.
News & Media
These long-overdue steps were extracted from tax-averse lawmakers only under duress.
News & Media
Polysaccharides were extracted from Asparagus officinalis.
Individual datasets were extracted from accepted articles.
Data were extracted from 13 longitudinal studies.
Science
They were extracted from real tomography reconstructions.
Science
were extracted from the 3D image analysis.
Hemodynamic data were extracted from medical charts.
Science
Different parts were extracted from different learners.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were extracted from", ensure the source is clearly identified to provide context and credibility.
Common error
Avoid vague references. Instead of saying "Data were extracted from studies", specify which studies or databases were used.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were extracted from" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that something was removed or obtained from a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
23%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Social Media
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were extracted from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that indicates the source of specific information or materials. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, as evidenced by Ludwig AI's analysis, it serves to provide clarity and validation by explicitly stating the origin. To maximize effectiveness, specify the exact source to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "were obtained from" or "were derived from" exist, the core meaning remains consistent: something specific was taken from somewhere specific.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were obtained from
Focuses on the act of acquiring something from a source.
were derived from
Highlights the origin or derivation of something from a source.
were taken from
Emphasizes the act of removing something from a source.
were obtained by
Indicates the method or means by which something was acquired.
were sourced from
Specifies the origin or supplier of something.
were gathered from
Suggests a collection or accumulation of items from various places.
were collected from
Similar to 'gathered from', but implies a more organized collection.
were isolated from
Implies a separation or extraction from a complex mixture.
were retrieved from
Emphasizes the act of recovering something from storage or a database.
were drawn from
Suggests a selection or sampling from a larger pool.
FAQs
How to use "were extracted from" in a sentence?
The phrase "were extracted from" indicates that specific information or materials were taken or derived from a particular source. For example, "The key findings "were extracted from" the research paper".
What can I say instead of "were extracted from"?
You can use alternatives like "were obtained from", "were derived from", or "were taken from" depending on the specific context.
Which is correct, "were extracted from" or "was extracted from"?
"Were extracted from" is used when referring to multiple items or plural nouns, while "was extracted from" is used for singular nouns. For example, "Data were extracted from the reports" vs "The key quote was extracted from the interview".
What's the difference between "were extracted from" and "were copied from"?
"Were extracted from" implies a careful selection or isolation of specific pieces of information or material, while "were copied from" suggests a more direct and complete duplication. Thus, "were extracted from" means the part you take is smaller and more selective than "were copied from".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested