were evicted by force

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were evicted by force" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing situations where individuals or groups are forcibly removed from a property or location. Example: "The tenants were evicted by force after failing to pay their rent for several months."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

A stampede caused more than 300 deaths in 2006, while in 1979 militants took over the grand mosque and were evicted by force.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

"These villagers are evicted by force, they are beaten until they go; entire villages are emptied out.

The Guardian

In 2007, when the Taliban took root around the town of Babaji, they were evicted by British forces helped by the militias.

The Economist

They were evicted by bailiffs in May, but have vowed to fight on.

The Economist

History buffs will note that the inhabitants of that Versailles were evicted by an angry mob.

The New York Times

They were evicted by large numbers of security guards.

BBC

Homelessness will increase as some tenants will not be able to afford higher rents and many will be evicted by landlords forced to sell".

The Guardian - Business

He was evicted by a magistrate from the apartment.

The New Yorker

This is still claimed by Vietnam, which was evicted by China from the islands in 1974.

The Economist

Opik was the second person to be evicted by the public.

BBC

Jewish settlers who occupied the building without permission were evicted last year by the Defense Ministry.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing events where individuals or groups are forcibly removed, consider using "were evicted by force" to emphasize the lack of consent and the use of coercion. This phrase adds a layer of gravity and highlights the injustice of the situation.

Common error

While "were evicted by force" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Sometimes, using an active voice construction like "Authorities forcibly evicted the residents" is more direct and impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were evicted by force" functions as a passive construction, describing an action performed upon a subject. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct and usable in written English, typically within descriptive or narrative contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Science

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were evicted by force" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to describe the forceful removal of individuals or groups from a property. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for formal and neutral contexts like news reports and official documentation. While other similar phrases like "forcibly removed" or "ousted by force" exist, "were evicted by force" emphasizes both the lack of consent and the use of coercion, adding a layer of gravity to the situation. It is most commonly found in news and media, emphasizing its role in reporting events involving displacement and power dynamics. While it's correct, remember to avoid overuse of passive voice and choose the most impactful construction for your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

forcibly removed

Emphasizes the action of removal with force, replacing "evicted" with a more general term.

forcibly displaced

Highlights the displacement aspect of the eviction, suggesting a broader impact than just removal from a property.

removed under duress

Indicates that the removal occurred due to pressure or coercion, rather than necessarily physical force.

forcibly expelled

Suggests a more formal or official act of removal, often from a country or organization.

ousted by force

Implies a forceful removal from a position of power or influence.

driven out by force

Emphasizes the act of being compelled to leave by some kind of imposed force.

compelled to leave by force

Focuses on the compulsion to leave against one's will, due to external force.

forcibly ejected

Highlights the act of being thrown out physically and against one's will.

were made to vacate by force

Expresses that the people were not willing to leave but someone or something forced them.

under compulsion of force

Highlights the compulsory nature and expresses it using a more technical word such as "compulsion".

FAQs

What does "were evicted by force" mean?

The phrase "were evicted by force" means that individuals or groups were removed from a property or location against their will, using physical power or coercion.

What are some alternatives to "were evicted by force"?

Alternatives include "forcibly removed", "forcibly displaced", or "ousted by force". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "were evicted by force" formal or informal language?

"Were evicted by force" is generally considered neutral, suitable for news reports, formal documents, and general writing. More informal alternatives might exist, but this phrase strikes a balance between clarity and seriousness.

How can I use "were evicted by force" in a sentence?

Example: "The villagers "were evicted by force" after the mining company acquired the land."