Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were evaluated against

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were evaluated against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the criteria or standards used to assess something, often in research or analysis contexts. Example: "The results of the experiment were evaluated against the established benchmarks to determine their validity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In addition, the findings were evaluated against a separate evaluation study by an independent researcher [ 47].

cruzi thiosemicarbazones were evaluated against cruzain.

The kinetic parameters were evaluated against experimental data.

Science

Polymer

Their herbicidal activities were evaluated against a variety of weeds.

Their biological activities were evaluated against Plasmodium falciparum.

The compounds were evaluated against five resistant strains of MTB.

In addition, these compounds were evaluated against "normal" cell lines.

Furthermore these compounds were evaluated against human Topoisomerase IIα inhibition.

To assess methodological rigour, the papers were evaluated against a checklist of key issues exploring validity.

These four compounds were evaluated against the Yersinia PTPase, PTP1B, TCPTP, CD45, and LAR.

Furthermore, they were evaluated against β-secretase; however, they showed low inhibitory activity.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were evaluated against", ensure the criteria or standards against which something is being evaluated are clearly defined. This provides context and strengthens the validity of the assessment.

Common error

Avoid using "were evaluated against" without specifying what the evaluation was based on. For example, instead of saying "The results were evaluated against expectations", specify which expectations: "The results were evaluated against pre-defined performance metrics".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were evaluated against" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has been subjected to a process of assessment in relation to a specific standard or set of criteria. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were evaluated against" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, predominantly within scientific and academic contexts. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it serves to convey that a subject has been assessed using defined standards or criteria. To ensure clarity and precision in your writing, specify exactly what standards were used for evaluation. While synonyms like "were assessed in relation to" and "were compared with" exist, "were evaluated against" is particularly suited for objective, criteria-based analyses. The phrase's prevalence in authoritative sources confirms its reliability and appropriateness in formal writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were evaluated against" in a sentence?

Use "were evaluated against" to show that something was assessed according to a specific standard or criteria. For example, "The new drug's efficacy "was evaluated against" the existing treatment protocols".

What are some alternatives to "were evaluated against"?

You can use phrases like "were assessed in relation to", "were compared with", or "were validated against" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "evaluate against"?

While both are grammatically correct, passive voice ("were evaluated against") is often preferred in scientific writing to maintain objectivity. Active voice (e.g., "Researchers evaluated the data against the hypothesis") is suitable when you want to emphasize the actor.

What is the difference between "were evaluated against" and "were assessed against"?

The terms are largely interchangeable. "Were assessed against" might imply a slightly broader or more holistic judgment, while "were evaluated against" might suggest a more structured, criteria-based analysis.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: