Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were employed in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were employed in" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone or a group of people who are currently employed in a certain job, industry, or occupation. For example: "Many workers were employed in the mining industry in the 19th century."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
96% of female graduates were employed in 2005.
News & Media
Large numbers of slaves were employed in agriculture.
Encyclopedias
By 1910 one-tenth of workers were employed in industry.
Encyclopedias
The victims came from nearly 80 countries, and most were employed in global trade and finance.
News & Media
This was the first time US troops were employed in an offensive role".
News & Media
It showed that fewer Americans over all were employed in October.
News & Media
Far more of the men were employed in proof-reading, producing and distributing the newspaper.
News & Media
The inmates of Greenwich Village were employed in sewer and road-construction work.
News & Media
One in five people in the town were employed in manufacturing – today it's one in 10.
News & Media
During World War Two, chemical means were employed in Hitler's mass exterminations.
News & Media
He also declared that too many prelates were employed in the Curial offices.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were employed in", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what was being used. For example, instead of saying "Techniques were employed", specify "Specific statistical techniques were employed".
Common error
A common mistake is to use "were employed in" with an ambiguous subject. Avoid sentences like "Methods were employed", which lacks clarity. Instead, specify what or who was employing the methods; for example, "Researchers were employed in developing new methods".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were employed in" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of being hired or used in a particular capacity. As Ludwig AI explains, this is a grammatically correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
Science
45%
News & Media
30%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were employed in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that serves to describe the roles or utilization of individuals or resources in various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is perfectly acceptable for use in written English. It is predominantly found in scientific and news-related contexts but maintains a neutral to formal register. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who or what was being utilized and avoid vague subjects. Alternatives such as "were utilized within" or "were engaged in" can be used to add variety, yet the key is maintaining specificity in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were utilized within
Replaces 'employed' with 'utilized', focusing on the use of something rather than people.
were engaged in
Uses 'engaged' instead of 'employed', suggesting active participation or involvement.
were used for
Simplifies the phrase to focus on the purpose for which something was used.
were involved in
Indicates participation or connection to a particular activity or role.
were active in
Emphasizes the active role within a specific domain or industry.
were tasked with
Highlights the assignment of responsibilities or duties.
were instrumental in
Indicates a significant contribution or importance in achieving a specific outcome.
were occupied in
Focuses on the state of being busy or engaged in a specific activity.
were dedicated to
Implies commitment and focus towards a specific goal or area of work.
were assigned to
Highlights the act of being allocated to a particular task or role.
FAQs
How can I use "were employed in" in a sentence?
Use "were employed in" to indicate that someone or something was used in a particular role or activity. For example, "Many workers "were employed in" the construction of the bridge".
What are some alternatives to saying "were employed in"?
You can use alternatives such as "were utilized within", "were engaged in", or "were used for" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were employed in"?
While "were employed in" is in the passive voice, its appropriateness depends on the context. If the focus is on the object or recipient of the action, passive voice is suitable. If the focus is on the actor, use active voice. For example, instead of "New methods "were employed in" this study", consider "Researchers employed new methods in this study" if the researchers are the focal point.
What's the difference between "were employed in" and "were working in"?
"Were employed in" refers specifically to being hired or used for a task, while "were working in" indicates general work activity. For instance, "Many people "were employed in" the factory" suggests a formal employment relationship, while "Many people "were working in" the factory" simply indicates their presence and activity there.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested