Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were counted for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were counted for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to items being tallied or enumerated for a particular purpose. For example: "The votes were counted for the election and the results were announced shortly afterward."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Fifty hinges were counted for each genotype.

At least 100 cells were counted for each sample.

Over 100 nanosheets were counted for each sample.

At least 5000 nuclei were counted for each sample.

Twenty wing discs were counted for each genotype.

Forty-eight chromosomes (2n = 48) were counted for var.

Both fractions were counted for radioactivity in a gamma counter.

50 nuclei were counted for each sample.

Science

Plosone

50 cells were counted for quantification purposes.

Science

Plosone

>750 cells were counted for each condition.

Science

Plosone

Thirty 400× fields were counted for each.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were counted for", ensure the context clearly indicates what the items are being counted for. Providing this context adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were counted for" when active voice would be more direct and clear. For example, instead of "the samples were counted for radioactivity by the researchers", consider "the researchers counted the samples for radioactivity".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were counted for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject received the action of being counted. The inclusion of "for" introduces the purpose or reason behind the counting, as demonstrated in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were counted for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's especially common in scientific and research contexts to indicate that items have been enumerated for a specific purpose. While alternatives like "were tallied for" or "were enumerated for" exist, "were counted for" clearly conveys the notion of a purposeful quantification. When using this phrase, ensure the context of why the items were counted is clear to avoid ambiguity.

FAQs

How can I use "were counted for" in a sentence?

Use "were counted for" to indicate that items have been tallied or enumerated for a specific reason. For instance, "The votes "were counted for" each candidate to determine the winner".

What's the difference between "were counted for" and "were counted in"?

"Were counted for" indicates a purpose or reason for the count, whereas "were counted in" simply means included in a total number. For example, "Those votes "were counted for" Smith", versus "Those votes "were counted in" the final tally.

What are some alternatives to "were counted for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "were tallied for", "were enumerated for", or "were factored into". Choose the option that best reflects the meaning you intend to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "were counted for" in formal writing?

Yes, "were counted for" is appropriate in formal writing, particularly in scientific, research, or technical contexts where precise enumeration is required. However, ensure the sentence structure is clear and concise for the specific context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: