were corrected for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were corrected for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing adjustments made to account for certain variables or factors in a study or analysis. Example: "The results of the experiment were corrected for temperature variations to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Data were corrected for pCO2.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

All datasets were corrected for radioactive decay.

EJNMMI Research

The results were corrected for this effect.

Polymer

Measurements were corrected for partial volume effects.

EJNMMI Research

Analyses were corrected for false discovery rate.

Annals of Intensive Care

All activities were corrected for decay.

EJNMMI Research

All spectra were corrected for solvent background.

Chemistry Central Journal

Calendar-life degradation effects were corrected for using control cells.

Journal of Power Sources

The semi-continuous measurements were corrected for several operating parameters.

Atmospheric Environment

All analyses were corrected for the complex survey design.

Social Science & Medicine

PET images were corrected for decay and converted to SUV.

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were corrected for", ensure the factor being corrected is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "The data were corrected for age and gender."

Common error

Avoid using "were corrected for" without specifying what the correction was applied to. A sentence like "The results were corrected" is vague; instead, state "The results were corrected for inflation."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were corrected for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a specific adjustment or modification has been applied to some data or results. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were corrected for" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction primarily used in scientific and academic writing to indicate that data or results have been adjusted to account for specific factors. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and provides numerous examples in science-related contexts. When using this phrase, be sure to explicitly state the factor being corrected to maintain clarity. Alternatives like "were adjusted for" or "were modified to account for" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were adjusted for

Implies a modification to achieve a desired state or standard; interchangeable in many contexts.

were modified to account for

More explicit about the reason for the change, emphasizing the influence of specific factors.

were calibrated for

Suggests a precise adjustment against a known standard, often used in technical contexts.

were normalized for

Indicates a transformation to a standard scale, allowing for comparison across different datasets.

were standardized for

Similar to 'normalized', but can also refer to adjustments made to conform to a defined protocol.

were rectified for

Focuses on the correction of errors or inaccuracies.

were accounted for

Highlights the inclusion or consideration of specific elements during calculation or analysis.

were amended for

Implies a formal revision or alteration to improve accuracy or validity.

were revised based on

Emphasizes that changes were made in direct response to new information or analysis.

were recalculated considering

Highlights a complete re-evaluation taking into account a specific factor.

FAQs

How is "were corrected for" used in research papers?

In research, "were corrected for" indicates that adjustments were made to data or results to account for confounding variables, biases, or errors. For example, "P-values "were corrected for" multiple comparisons" implies a statistical adjustment to maintain the significance level.

What's the difference between "were adjusted for" and "were corrected for"?

"Were adjusted for" implies a modification to achieve a desired state or standard, while "were corrected for" specifically targets errors or inaccuracies. The two are interchangeable in most scientific contexts.

What are some synonyms for "were corrected for"?

Synonyms include "were modified to account for", "were calibrated for", or "were normalized for", depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to specify what "were corrected for"?

Yes, specifying the factor that the data "were corrected for" is essential for clarity and transparency, enabling readers to understand the methodology and validity of the results.