Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were considered to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were considered to" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to introduce an action that is viewed in a certain way by someone or something. Example: The students' efforts were considered to be commendable by their teachers.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
(The two undercover cops were considered to be John's victims).
News & Media
Values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
Science & Research
Differences at P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Science & Research
P-values < 0.05 were considered to show significant differences.
Science & Research
The differences were considered to be significant if p < 0.05.
Science & Research
P values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.
Science & Research
Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Science & Research
P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Science & Research
Differences were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.
Science & Research
And it said the themes were considered to be "appropriate".
News & Media
P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider the level of formality required by the context. While "were considered to" is generally acceptable, alternatives like "were deemed to be" might be more suitable for formal writing.
Common error
Avoid using "was considered to" with plural subjects. The verb "were" must agree with a plural subject. For example, instead of "The results was considered to be significant", use "The results were considered to be significant".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were considered to" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a subject received a particular assessment, judgment, or opinion. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the structure is grammatically sound and widely utilized, showing that the actions have been performed by an unknown actor or actors.
Frequent in
Science
76%
News & Media
19%
Academia
3%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were considered to" is a versatile phrase used to express widely held beliefs, opinions, or judgments. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage in both formal and informal writing, particularly within scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure subject-verb agreement and consider the level of formality appropriate for your audience. Alternative phrases like ""were deemed to be"" or ""were regarded as"" can add nuance to your writing. Remember to avoid common errors such as using singular verbs with plural subjects.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were regarded as
Employs "regarded as" to convey the idea of something being viewed in a specific manner.
were viewed as
Substitutes "considered" with "viewed", indicating a perspective or way of looking at something.
were seen as
Emphasizes the perception or impression of something, similar to "viewed as".
were deemed to be
Replaces "considered" with "deemed", implying a more formal judgment or assessment.
were judged to be
Uses "judged" to indicate an evaluation or assessment leading to a conclusion.
were understood to be
Uses "understood" to emphasize a shared or common comprehension of something.
were held to be
Implies a formal or official holding of an opinion or judgment.
were thought to be
Uses "thought" instead of "considered", suggesting a more general or less formal opinion.
were believed to be
Replaces "considered" with "believed", suggesting a conviction or faith in something.
were known as
Indicates a common or established understanding of something's nature or identity.
FAQs
How can I use "were considered to" in a sentence?
Use "were considered to" to express that something was thought of or regarded in a particular way. For example, "The experiments "were considered to" be successful after multiple trials".
What are some alternatives to "were considered to"?
Alternatives include "were deemed to be", "were thought to be", or "were regarded as". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "was considered to" instead of "were considered to"?
No, "was considered to" is used with singular subjects, while "were considered to" is used with plural subjects. For a singular subject, the correct form is "was considered to be". For example: "The project was considered to be a success".
What's the difference between "were considered to be" and "were believed to be"?
"Were considered to be" implies a more formal assessment or judgment, while "were believed to be" suggests a conviction or widely held opinion. The phrase "were believed to be" indicates that something was accepted as true based on faith or trust, rather than concrete evidence.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested