Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were considered to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were considered to" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to introduce an action that is viewed in a certain way by someone or something. Example: The students' efforts were considered to be commendable by their teachers.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(The two undercover cops were considered to be John's victims).

News & Media

The New Yorker

Values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Science & Research

Nature

Differences at P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Science & Research

Nature

P-values < 0.05 were considered to show significant differences.

Science & Research

Nature

The differences were considered to be significant if p < 0.05.

Science & Research

Nature

P values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Science & Research

Nature

Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Science & Research

Nature

P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Science & Research

Nature

Differences were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Science & Research

Nature

And it said the themes were considered to be "appropriate".

News & Media

The Guardian

P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the level of formality required by the context. While "were considered to" is generally acceptable, alternatives like "were deemed to be" might be more suitable for formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was considered to" with plural subjects. The verb "were" must agree with a plural subject. For example, instead of "The results was considered to be significant", use "The results were considered to be significant".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were considered to" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a subject received a particular assessment, judgment, or opinion. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the structure is grammatically sound and widely utilized, showing that the actions have been performed by an unknown actor or actors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

19%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were considered to" is a versatile phrase used to express widely held beliefs, opinions, or judgments. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage in both formal and informal writing, particularly within scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure subject-verb agreement and consider the level of formality appropriate for your audience. Alternative phrases like ""were deemed to be"" or ""were regarded as"" can add nuance to your writing. Remember to avoid common errors such as using singular verbs with plural subjects.

FAQs

How can I use "were considered to" in a sentence?

Use "were considered to" to express that something was thought of or regarded in a particular way. For example, "The experiments "were considered to" be successful after multiple trials".

What are some alternatives to "were considered to"?

Alternatives include "were deemed to be", "were thought to be", or "were regarded as". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was considered to" instead of "were considered to"?

No, "was considered to" is used with singular subjects, while "were considered to" is used with plural subjects. For a singular subject, the correct form is "was considered to be". For example: "The project was considered to be a success".

What's the difference between "were considered to be" and "were believed to be"?

"Were considered to be" implies a more formal assessment or judgment, while "were believed to be" suggests a conviction or widely held opinion. The phrase "were believed to be" indicates that something was accepted as true based on faith or trust, rather than concrete evidence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: