Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were characterized for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were characterized for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would typically be "were characterized by." Example: "The species were characterized by their unique adaptations to the environment."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The formulations were characterized for particle size and encapsulation efficiency.
Science
Formulations were characterized for physical properties and tribological behavior.
Science
Pellets were characterized for physico-mechanical properties viz.
The developed dendrimeric formulations were characterized for size, loading efficiency.
The as-processed samples were characterized for microstructure and texture.
Powders were characterized for size, morphology, flowability and aerodynamic properties.
These cells were characterized for their stem-cell properties.
Science
Deposits were characterized for its structure, morphology and hardness.
The networks were characterized for mechanical and swell characteristics.
Science
The hybrid CNT/IGZO-integrated circuits were characterized for their electrical performance as described in later sections of this report.
Science & Research
Terpolymers were characterized for composition, conversion, molecular weight and glass transition temperature, latexes were characterized for viscosity and particle size while adhesives were characterized for tack, peel strength, shear strength, storage modulus, loss modulus and tan delta.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer "were characterized by" to accurately convey that something is defined or described by specific attributes. For example, "The samples were characterized by their high purity levels."
Common error
Avoid using "for" after "characterized". The correct preposition is "by". Using "for" can lead to grammatically incorrect sentences and confuse the intended meaning.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
3.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were characterized for" functions as a passive verb phrase aiming to describe specific features or qualities attributed to a subject. While widely used as Ludwig AI underlines, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect; "were characterized by" is the correct form.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "were characterized for" is frequently used, especially in scientific literature. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect in standard written English; the correct phrasing is "were characterized by". Despite its common usage, particularly in science, opting for "were characterized by" ensures grammatical accuracy. Alternatives like "were defined by", "were marked by", or "were identified by" can also be considered depending on the context to describe the specific properties or qualities of something. While prevalent, strive for "were characterized by" to maintain grammatical correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were defined by
Emphasizes the essential characteristics that determine the nature of something.
were marked by
Highlights notable features or indicators.
were distinguished by
Focuses on unique qualities that set something apart.
were identified by
Focuses on the features that distinguish something.
were tested for
Highlights the attributes or features that were examined.
were known by
Implies a recognition or understanding based on certain attributes.
were classified according to
Emphasizes the classification or grouping based on particular attributes.
were assessed for
Indicates that something was evaluated with respect to a specific quality.
were notable for
Highlights characteristics that make something remarkable or worthy of attention.
were evaluated regarding
Indicates the assessment of the parameters.
FAQs
What is the correct preposition to use with "were characterized"?
The correct preposition to use is "by", as in "were characterized by". The phrase "were characterized for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.
What does "were characterized by" mean?
It means that something is defined or distinguished by certain qualities or features. For example, a species might be characterized by its unique adaptations.
Are there alternatives to "were characterized by"?
Yes, alternatives include "were defined by", "were marked by", or "were identified by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it acceptable to use "were characterized for" in any context?
While frequently used, especially in scientific contexts, Ludwig AI marks "were characterized for" as incorrect in standard written English. It's generally better to use "were characterized by".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
3.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested