Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were characterized for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were characterized for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would typically be "were characterized by." Example: "The species were characterized by their unique adaptations to the environment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The formulations were characterized for particle size and encapsulation efficiency.

Formulations were characterized for physical properties and tribological behavior.

Science

Wear

Pellets were characterized for physico-mechanical properties viz.

The developed dendrimeric formulations were characterized for size, loading efficiency.

The as-processed samples were characterized for microstructure and texture.

Powders were characterized for size, morphology, flowability and aerodynamic properties.

These cells were characterized for their stem-cell properties.

Science

Methods

Deposits were characterized for its structure, morphology and hardness.

The networks were characterized for mechanical and swell characteristics.

Science

Polymer

The hybrid CNT/IGZO-integrated circuits were characterized for their electrical performance as described in later sections of this report.

Science & Research

Nature

Terpolymers were characterized for composition, conversion, molecular weight and glass transition temperature, latexes were characterized for viscosity and particle size while adhesives were characterized for tack, peel strength, shear strength, storage modulus, loss modulus and tan delta.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer "were characterized by" to accurately convey that something is defined or described by specific attributes. For example, "The samples were characterized by their high purity levels."

Common error

Avoid using "for" after "characterized". The correct preposition is "by". Using "for" can lead to grammatically incorrect sentences and confuse the intended meaning.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were characterized for" functions as a passive verb phrase aiming to describe specific features or qualities attributed to a subject. While widely used as Ludwig AI underlines, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect; "were characterized by" is the correct form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were characterized for" is frequently used, especially in scientific literature. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect in standard written English; the correct phrasing is "were characterized by". Despite its common usage, particularly in science, opting for "were characterized by" ensures grammatical accuracy. Alternatives like "were defined by", "were marked by", or "were identified by" can also be considered depending on the context to describe the specific properties or qualities of something. While prevalent, strive for "were characterized by" to maintain grammatical correctness.

FAQs

What is the correct preposition to use with "were characterized"?

The correct preposition to use is "by", as in "were characterized by". The phrase "were characterized for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.

What does "were characterized by" mean?

It means that something is defined or distinguished by certain qualities or features. For example, a species might be characterized by its unique adaptations.

Are there alternatives to "were characterized by"?

Yes, alternatives include "were defined by", "were marked by", or "were identified by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it acceptable to use "were characterized for" in any context?

While frequently used, especially in scientific contexts, Ludwig AI marks "were characterized for" as incorrect in standard written English. It's generally better to use "were characterized by".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: