Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were available for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were available for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that options, resources, or opportunities existed or were offered in the past. For example: When I first moved to the city, there were many job opportunities available for me.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

None were available for comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Grief counselors were available for students.

(Six episodes were available for review).

Naturally, duplicate pieces were available for purchase.

News & Media

The New York Times

No stable owners were available for comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Accounts were available for 1998 and 1999.

News & Media

The New York Times

Both were available for 20 euros each.

News & Media

The New York Times

No slides were available for Pat115.

Science & Research

Nature

Tickets were available for general sale.

News & Media

The Guardian

RDTs were available for all 274 samples, while DBS were available for 141.

Science & Research

Nature

Results: Data were available for 789 women.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing past events or conditions, ensure that "were available for" is followed by a noun or gerund that clearly indicates what was accessible or suitable. For example, "Tickets were available for purchase" or "Data were available for analysis."

Common error

Avoid using "was available for" when referring to multiple subjects. The correct form for plural subjects is "were available for". For example, "The reports were available for review", not "The reports was available for review".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were available for" primarily functions as a predicate adjective describing the state or condition of a noun. It indicates that something existed or was accessible for a specific purpose. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating this function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were available for" is a grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something was accessible or obtainable in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. It functions as a predicate adjective, informing about past opportunities, resources, or conditions. The phrase is most commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts. Related phrases include "were accessible to" and "were obtainable for", offering similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. Remember to maintain subject-verb agreement by using "were" with plural subjects and to ensure clarity by specifying what exactly was available. This phrase is versatile and reliable for expressing past availability in both formal and informal communication.

FAQs

How can I use "were available for" in a sentence?

You can use "were available for" to indicate that something was accessible or obtainable in the past. For instance, "The documents "were available for" inspection last week" or "Tickets "were available for" purchase online".

What are some alternatives to "were available for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "were accessible to", "were obtainable for", or "were provided to", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was available for" instead of "were available for"?

The correctness depends on the subject. Use "was available for" with singular subjects (e.g., "The document was available for review"), and use "were available for" with plural subjects (e.g., "The documents "were available for" review").

What's the difference between "were available for" and "became available for"?

"Were available for" indicates that something was accessible or obtainable at a certain point in the past. "Became available for" suggests that something was not previously accessible but then became so. For example, "The data "were available for" analysis in 2020," versus "The data "became available for" analysis after the study was completed."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: