Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were assumed to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were assumed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing beliefs or expectations about a subject in the past. Example: "The results of the experiment were assumed to validate the initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But things were assumed to be different for women.

News & Media

The New Yorker

All were assumed to have malaria and scabies.

Moody's and Standard & Poor's were assumed to know best.

News & Media

The Economist

Two were assumed to be workers because they were handcuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Monochorionic placentas were assumed to be MZ.

Both distributions were assumed to be Gaussian.

Larger particles were assumed to undergo aggregation.

Catalyst particles were assumed to be isothermal and isoconcentrational.

The buildings were assumed to be founded on shallow foundations.

Only bull calves were assumed to be genotyped.

Material interfaces were assumed to be fully bonded.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were assumed to", ensure the context clearly indicates who made the assumption and the basis for it. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were assumed to" without providing any context or justification for the assumption. Unsupported assumptions can weaken your argument and make your writing less credible.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were assumed to" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating a past supposition or presumption. As Ludwig AI explains, it's used when something was taken for granted or supposed true without definitive proof, as seen in examples from science and news media.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were assumed to" is a common passive verb phrase used to express past presumptions or suppositions. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates that something was taken for granted, often without concrete evidence, primarily within scientific and news contexts. Its neutral to formal register makes it suitable for academic, scientific, and journalistic writing. For more precise communication, consider alternatives like "were presumed to" or "were believed to" depending on the specific context and desired nuance. Remember to provide context for any assumptions to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were assumed to" in a sentence?

The phrase "were assumed to" is used to indicate that something was taken for granted or supposed to be true, often without concrete evidence. For example, "The missing files "were assumed to" have been accidentally deleted".

What phrases can I use instead of "were assumed to"?

Alternatives include "were presumed to", "were thought to be", or "were understood to be", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "were assumed to" or "were believed to"?

The choice between "were assumed to" and "were believed to" depends on the context. "Were assumed to" suggests a supposition, while "were believed to" implies a stronger conviction or faith. Therefore, choose the phrase that best reflects the level of certainty involved.

What is the difference between "were assumed to" and "were expected to"?

"Were assumed to" indicates a supposition, while "were expected to" implies an anticipation or prediction. The former is based on taking something for granted, whereas the latter is based on anticipated outcomes.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: