Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were administered to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were administered to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something, such as medication or treatment, is given to someone or something. Example: "The vaccines were administered to all eligible participants in the study."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Restraints were administered to young women for talking back or mumbling under their breath.
News & Media
Tests were administered to 4th, 8th and 11th graders in the spring.
News & Media
Surveys were administered to facilitate data collection.
These questionnaires were administered to teachers and their students.
Sedatives were administered to 84%% of mechanically ventilated patients.
Science
300 questionnaires were administered to the hotel guests.
Structured questionnaires were administered to randomly selected respondents.
Science
Semi structured questionnaires were administered to 90 respondents.
Fluids were administered to prevent decreases in cardiac output.
Propofol and dexmedetomidine were administered to provide adequate sedation.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
Questionnaires were administered to obtain study-relevant information from participants.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were administered to", ensure the subject receiving the action is clearly defined. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures clarity in your writing.
Common error
Avoid overusing passive voice constructions like "were administered to". While grammatically correct, excessive use can make your writing sound indirect and less engaging. Consider active voice alternatives where appropriate for a more direct and impactful tone.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were administered to" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received a particular action. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. It is frequently used to describe the application of treatments, tests, or substances to a recipient.
Frequent in
Science
77%
News & Media
19%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were administered to" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to describe the act of giving or applying something, especially in formal contexts like science and medicine. According to Ludwig AI, it is a valid and usable phrase. While it's suitable for reporting objective facts, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing less engaging. Consider using active voice alternatives for a more direct tone when appropriate. Alternatives include phrases like "were given to" and "were provided to". Understanding the nuances of this phrase and its alternatives will enhance the clarity and effectiveness of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were given to
This alternative is a more straightforward and common way to express that something was provided or delivered to someone or something.
were provided to
This alternative emphasizes the act of supplying or furnishing something to someone or something.
were supplied to
This alternative highlights the act of furnishing or making something available to someone or something, often implying a regular or ongoing provision.
were dispensed to
This alternative suggests a controlled or measured distribution of something, often in the context of medication or resources.
were applied to
This alternative emphasizes the act of putting something onto or into something else, often in a practical or therapeutic sense.
were delivered to
This alternative focuses on the act of transporting or conveying something to a specific location or recipient.
were issued to
This alternative implies a formal or official distribution of something, often in the context of permits, licenses, or equipment.
were allocated to
This alternative suggests a specific assignment or distribution of resources, funds, or responsibilities to different entities or purposes.
were directed towards
This alternative emphasizes the focus or target of an action or resource, indicating where efforts or provisions were channeled.
were channeled to
This alternative stresses the guiding or directing of something towards a specific destination or purpose, often implying a controlled or deliberate process.
FAQs
How can I use "were administered to" in a sentence?
"Were administered to" indicates that something was given or applied to a subject. For example, "The vaccines "were administered to" all participants in the study" or "Pain medication "were administered to" the patient after surgery".
What are some alternatives to "were administered to"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "were given to", "were provided to", or "were applied to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "administer"?
While "were administered to" (passive) is grammatically correct, active voice can often be more direct. For example, instead of "The medication "were administered to" the patients", you could say "The doctors administered the medication to the patients".
What is the difference between "were administered to" and "were given to"?
"Were administered to" often implies a formal or controlled delivery, especially in medical or official contexts. "Were given to" is a more general term and can be used in a wider range of situations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested