Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were acknowledged

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were acknowledged" is correct and usable in written English.
It is a past-tense form of the verb "to acknowledge," which means to recognize or admit something. For example, "The hard work of the volunteers were acknowledged by the mayor with a public ceremony."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Fifth, the atrocities were acknowledged.

News & Media

The New York Times

My changes were acknowledged with fitting tribute.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Dickinson's talents were acknowledged by his peers.

Their corresponding heating efficiencies were acknowledged through infrared camera.

The low‐level raids on Saturday were acknowledged by.

News & Media

The New York Times

His power and influence were acknowledged and celebrated in Washington.

News & Media

The New York Times

Other sporting figures were acknowledged in the Australia Day honours.

His achievements were acknowledged in varying ways over the years.

All were acknowledged and provided for in his will.

Guthrie's social protest songs were acknowledged with varying choreographic effectiveness.

Many Philharmonic players were acknowledged with well-earned solo bows.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were acknowledged", ensure that the subject performing the acknowledgment is clear. This adds precision and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "were acknowledged" without a clear understanding of the passive voice. Ensure the sentence clearly indicates what was acknowledged and, if relevant, by whom. For example, instead of "Mistakes were acknowledged", write "Mistakes were acknowledged by the management".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were acknowledged" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something has been recognized or admitted. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct. The examples show it commonly appears when discussing events, efforts, or facts that have been recognized by others.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

40%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were acknowledged" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase, as Ludwig AI states. It signifies that something has been recognized, admitted, or validated. Its use spans across various contexts, notably in news, scientific research, and academic writing. While the phrase is generally neutral to formal, it requires careful attention to ensure clarity regarding what was acknowledged and by whom. Alternatives like "were recognized" or "were admitted" can be used depending on the specific nuance desired. Considering its prevalent usage in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, mastering this phrase is valuable for effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use "were acknowledged" in a sentence?

You can use "were acknowledged" to indicate that something has been recognized or admitted. For example, "The team's efforts "were acknowledged" by the manager during the meeting."

What are some alternatives to saying "were acknowledged"?

Some alternatives include "were recognized", "were admitted", or "were confirmed", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "acknowledge"?

Whether to use active or passive voice depends on the context. Active voice (e.g., "The manager acknowledged the team's efforts") is often more direct. Passive voice ("The team's efforts "were acknowledged" by the manager") is useful when the action is more important than the actor, or when the actor is unknown.

What's the difference between "were acknowledged" and "were recognized"?

While both phrases imply recognition, ""were acknowledged"" often suggests a formal or official recognition, while "were recognized" can be more general. For example, achievements are often recognized, while errors might be acknowledged.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: