were 3 months

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were 3 months" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a duration of time that has passed or is being discussed in a past context. Example: "The project was supposed to take only 2 months, but it ended up being delayed and were 3 months instead."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

"I've been taking classes with the boys by myself since they were 3 months," wrote one mom of 20-month-olds.

The New York Times

Mohammad Iqbal Safi, the head of the parliamentary defense committee and a member of the government commission, said the 60 children were 3 months old to 16 years old, all killed as they slept.

The New York Times

When the rats were 3 months old, the researchers tested the rats' memory.

Science Magazine

Overall, the run-through time for the patients with the longest waiting times were 3 months from start to finish, of which only 133 min were of value to the patient a shocking result for everybody in the section.

Insights into Imaging

Wyss-Coray's team measured neurogenesis, the creation of new neurons from stem cells, in mice that were 3 months old and mice that were almost 2 years old and considered adults.

Science Magazine

Mice in all experiments were 3 months of age.

Bioscience Reports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

"We were 18 months into that.

BBC

These animals were <3 months old at the time of immunohistochemistry.

Plosone

The mice used were 1 2 months old.

Plosone

They were ∼3 months old at the start of the experiment and were assigned at random to the two groups with 11 rats in the sham group.

Hippocampus

79 Third, the majority of available trials were <3 months, which is perhaps, too short a time to observe an effect for some outcomes (waist circumference, BP).

BMJ Open

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context provides enough information to understand what "were 3 months" refers to; specify the subject or event for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was 3 months" when referring to multiple items or subjects. The plural verb "were" must agree with a plural subject or a period involving multiple instances.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were 3 months" functions as a time adjunct, specifying the duration of a past event or state. It typically modifies a verb or clause, providing information about when something occurred or for how long it persisted. As Ludwig demonstrates, it is commonly used in scientific reports and general narratives.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were 3 months" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote a past duration of three months. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage, particularly in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject agrees in number with the plural verb "were" and that the context clearly indicates what the duration refers to. Alternatives like "lasted three months" or "spanning three months" can be used for stylistic variation. Avoid using "was 3 months" for plural subjects to maintain grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lasted three months

Replaces the verb "were" with "lasted" to describe the duration.

spanning three months

Emphasizes the period of time covered.

a three-month period

Nominalizes the phrase to focus on the duration as a defined period.

for a period of three months

Adds explicit indication of duration, more formal.

during three months

Highlights an action or event happening within the time frame.

over three months

Indicates a process or change occurring throughout the three months.

covering three months

Suggests a range or scope that the duration encompasses.

a three-month duration

More formal way to express the length of time.

throughout three months

Emphasizes that the action occurs continually or repeatedly.

encompassing three months

Indicates that the duration includes or surrounds certain events or activities.

FAQs

How can I use "were 3 months" in a sentence?

You can use "were 3 months" to describe the duration of an event in the past, as in "The follow-up intervals "were 3 months" for the first year".

What does "were 3 months" mean?

"Were 3 months" indicates a duration of three months in the past, usually as a past state or condition. For example, something lasted, occurred, or existed for a period of three months.

Which is correct, "were 3 months" or "was 3 months"?

Use "were 3 months" for plural subjects or when referring to multiple intervals or instances. Use "was 3 months" for singular subjects or a single event that lasted three months.

What can I say instead of "were 3 months"?

Alternatives include "lasted three months", "spanning three months", or "a three-month period" depending on the context.