well qualified of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "well qualified of" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would typically be "well qualified for." Example: "She is well qualified for the position due to her extensive experience and education."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

He would be uniquely well qualified, of course – but is he someone the capital could fall in love with?

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Some respondents argued that patients were at risk because delivery of health services was shifted from well qualified to lower cadres of health workers without ensuring continuous support supervision.

BMC Health Services Research

Villarreal had eight years of sales experience, and believed he was well qualified for the position of territory manager described in a posting on the employment Web site CareerBuilder as a liaison to retailers stocking R. J. Reynolds products.

The New Yorker

Griffin was an experienced leader in the field of aerospace and was widely perceived as someone well qualified for the job of guiding NASA as it turned in a new direction.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Some Tories believed Mr Ross was well qualified for the task of raising standards in England's schools as he founded a chain of 25 academies.

Independent

He would certainly be eminently well qualified for any number of non-executive directorships, with a plum chairmanship a possibility should one arise.

Independent

Alternative methods (reviewed elsewhere), such as time-weighted averages, are less well qualified for risk assessment of fluctuating concentrations, because they are not able to predict carry-over toxicity.

Environmental Science & Technology

Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan Senator Hagel is well qualified to serve as secretary of defense with his broad experience in national security affairs.

The New York Times

Frank Arnesen, who is full of admiration for Streich's work at Freiburg, has been on both sides of the fence and is well qualified to compare the merits of youth football in Germany and England.

The Guardian - Sport

Toynbee felt particularly well qualified to comment on the accuracy of Berger's portrayal of the physician as the book's subject happened to be his own doctor.

The Guardian - Books

Ms. Walker, 39, is well qualified to teach the arcana of placket insertion and blind stitching.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "for" instead of "of" after "well qualified". For example, "She is well qualified for the job" is correct.

Common error

Avoid using "of" after "well qualified". The correct preposition to use is "for". Using "of" makes the sentence grammatically incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "well qualified of" is intended to function as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, aiming to describe someone or something as possessing the necessary attributes for a specific role or purpose. However, it's grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, it should be "well qualified for."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "well qualified of" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "well qualified for". Ludwig AI confirms this, advising against its usage. Although attempts to use the phrase might aim to convey competence or suitability, the incorrect preposition undermines this purpose. The phrase is rare, and when it appears, it's often in news, science or encyclopedia sources. To avoid errors, always use "for" after "well qualified" and consider alternatives like "highly qualified for" or "suitably qualified for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

well qualified for

Replaces the incorrect preposition "of" with the correct preposition "for".

highly qualified for

Emphasizes the high degree of qualification using "highly" instead of "well", while using the correct preposition "for".

eminently qualified for

Highlights the exceptional level of qualification with "eminently" and uses the correct preposition "for".

suitably qualified for

Focuses on the appropriateness of the qualifications and uses the correct preposition "for".

adequately qualified for

Indicates a sufficient level of qualification and uses the correct preposition "for".

possessing the qualifications for

Rephrases the concept to emphasize the possession of necessary qualifications and uses the correct preposition "for".

having the right credentials for

Highlights the credentials as indicators of qualification and uses the correct preposition "for".

skilled and experienced in

Shifts the focus to skills and experience rather than formal qualifications and uses the correct preposition "in".

competent in the field of

Emphasizes competence in a specific area and replaces "qualified" with a related concept, using the correct preposition "of".

proficient in the area of

Indicates proficiency in a particular domain and replaces "qualified" with a related concept, using the correct preposition "of".

FAQs

What is the correct preposition to use after "well qualified"?

The correct preposition to use after "well qualified" is "for". For example, you should say "well qualified for the job" rather than "well qualified of the job".

What does it mean to be "well qualified for" something?

To be "well qualified for" something means you have the necessary skills, experience, and knowledge to perform a task or hold a position effectively. Consider alternatives such as "highly qualified for" or "suitably qualified for".

Is "well qualified of" ever correct?

No, "well qualified of" is not considered correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is "well qualified for". Using "of" in this context is a grammatical error.

What are some alternatives to saying someone is "well qualified for" a position?

You can use alternatives like "eminently qualified for", "adequately qualified for", or simply state that they have the "right credentials for" the job, depending on the nuance you want to convey.