weaker quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "weaker quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is of lower standard or inferior in comparison to something else. Example: "The product received negative reviews due to its weaker quality compared to its competitors."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Analysts at Keefe, Bruyette & Wood, said: "Overall, the results are of weaker quality than we were expecting, although still healthy.

The Guardian - Business

The earth encountered at Brookville was of a much weaker quality than at the Greenwood Tunnel, rendering the digging of the tunnel both an extremely dangerous and difficult task.

Wikipedia

The mechanism underlying the weaker quality of mother-infant interaction in mothers with postpartum depression is not entirely understood [ 2].

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

The main findings from papers relevant to each domain are presented hierarchically, based on the quality of the papers, with findings from better quality papers presented first, followed by papers of weaker quality.

BMC Psychiatry

Teas picked earlier in the day (8am-10am) or later in the day (3pm-5pm) will have a weaker quality, but if they ripen during these times, that's when they must be plucked.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The greater warmth (as well as strength) in their organs and limbs make men generally more irascible and aggressively forceful than women, who in turn generally excel in the "weaker" qualities of mercy and compassion.[16] The sexes are equal, however, as regards sensation, imagination and intellection.

SEP

Most prominently, studies of weak quality produced larger effect sizes.

Aggression and Violent Behavior

That kind of error, experts say, suggests both a lapse in the manufacturing process as well as weak quality controls.

The Washington Post

Ten studies were included in the final review; two were rated as moderate quality and eight were rated as weak quality.

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Mr Laidlaw said his report had found "a lack of transparency, inadequate planning and preparation, as well as a complex and confusing organisational structure with weak quality assurance and insufficient governance oversight".

Independent

The wrong selection can lead to undesirable conditions such as unsatisfied users, weak Quality of Service (QoS), network congestions, dropped and/or blocked calls, and wastage of valuable network resources.

Physical Communication

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing the quality of two or more items, use "weaker quality" to highlight the relative inferiority of one compared to the others. For example, "This brand's material has a "weaker quality" compared to the leading competitor".

Common error

Avoid using "weaker quality" when you mean simply "poor quality". "Weaker" implies a comparison. If there's no comparison, "poor quality" is more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "weaker quality" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase modifying a noun. It typically expresses a comparative assessment, indicating that the quality of something is inferior relative to another item or standard. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is both correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "weaker quality" is a grammatically sound phrase used to denote a comparative deficiency in quality. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is correct and usable in English. It is most frequently found in scientific publications, news articles, and wiki entries. When writing, ensure you are using it in a comparative sense and consider alternative phrases such as "inferior quality" or "subpar quality" depending on the context. Avoiding redundancy is also crucial; do not use "more weaker quality".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inferior quality

This alternative focuses on the substandard nature of the quality, emphasizing a lower grade or rank.

subpar quality

This suggests that the quality is below the expected or required level.

poor quality

This is a more general term indicating a lack of excellence or adequacy in quality.

lower quality

This phrase directly indicates a quality that is less than another, implying a comparison.

deficient quality

This emphasizes that the quality is lacking something essential or necessary.

compromised quality

This suggests that the quality has been negatively affected or reduced.

degraded quality

This indicates that the quality has deteriorated over time.

reduced quality

This simply states that the quality is less than it was previously.

diminished quality

Similar to reduced quality, this emphasizes a decrease in the level of quality.

flawed quality

This indicates that there are imperfections or defects affecting the quality.

FAQs

How can I use "weaker quality" in a sentence?

You can use "weaker quality" to compare the standards of different items, for example, "The budget version had a "weaker quality" compared to the original".

What are some alternatives to "weaker quality"?

Alternatives include "inferior quality", "subpar quality", or "poor quality", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "a more weaker quality"?

No, it's redundant. The comparative form "weaker" already implies 'more'. The correct phrase is "weaker quality".

What's the difference between "weaker quality" and "weak quality"?

"Weaker quality" implies a comparison to something else, while "weak quality" simply describes something as being of poor standard without direct comparison. "The rope had a "weak quality"" implies it's generally not good, while "the second rope has a "weaker quality"" means it's worse than the first.