we would call

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we would call" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express what someone would refer to something as, often in hypothetical or conditional situations. Example: "In this case, we would call it a success if we meet our goals by the end of the quarter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We would call it exploitation.

Independent

Today we would call them "sound bites".

The New York Times

Or, as we would call it, Scotland.

The New Yorker

Charlatans we would call them.

The New York Times

We would call him Andrew.

The New Yorker

We would call it grazing.

The New York Times - Travel

"We would call 'purity' 100 percent, not 80.

The New York Times

What we would call Neets then?

The Guardian

Today, we would call her homeless.

The New York Times

We would call it solitary confinement.

The Washington Post

"We would call for 100percentt cancellation".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When you say "we would call" something, ensure it aligns with the context. For example, if explaining a historical term in modern language.

Common error

Avoid repetitive use of "we would call" in formal or academic writing. Opt for stronger, more direct verbs like 'define', 'characterize', or 'designate' to maintain a professional tone and avoid sounding overly conversational.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we would call" primarily functions as an introductory expression to define, label, or characterize something. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it sets the stage for how a particular subject will be referred to or understood, often in a specific context or from a particular viewpoint.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

25%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we would call" is a versatile expression used to introduce a definition, label, or characterization, often to bridge understanding between complex concepts and a broader audience. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and quite common, particularly in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While generally neutral in register, it's advisable to avoid overuse in highly formal writing. Alternatives like "we might term" or "we could label" can offer a more sophisticated tone. By understanding its function and purpose, you can use "we would call" effectively to clarify and contextualize information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we might refer to as

Employs 'refer to as', suggesting a way of mentioning or alluding to something.

we might term

Substitutes 'call' with 'term', suggesting a more formal or technical designation.

we could label

Replaces 'call' with 'label', indicating a classification or categorization.

we may designate

Uses 'designate' instead of 'call', implying a formal assignment of a name or title.

we could name

Replaces 'call' with 'name', directly indicating the act of giving a name.

we might define

Employs 'define' instead of 'call', focusing on providing a specific meaning or explanation.

we can identify as

Offers 'identify as', suggesting a recognition or classification within a group or category.

we could characterize as

Utilizes 'characterize as' implying a description of distinctive features or qualities.

we may consider

Replaces 'call' with 'consider', indicating a thoughtful evaluation or judgment.

we can describe as

Uses 'describe as', focusing on providing a detailed account or representation.

FAQs

How can I use "we would call" in a sentence?

You can use "we would call" to introduce a term or concept, offering a specific interpretation or designation. For example, "In modern terms, "we would call this" a 'paradigm shift'.

What's the difference between "we would call" and "we could call"?

"We would call" suggests a hypothetical or conditional scenario, while "we could call" implies a possibility or suggestion. For example, "If that happens, "we would call" it a success" versus "We could call it a success, but there are other interpretations".

What can I say instead of "we would call"?

You can use alternatives like "we might term", "we could label", or "we might define" depending on the context.

Is "we would call" appropriate for formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "we would call" can sound informal. In formal contexts, consider stronger verbs like "define", "characterize", or "designate" for a more professional tone. Also, check if "we" refers to the actual writers of the formal piece of writing.