Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were waiting

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence 'We were waiting' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to convey that something was happening in the past and had not yet finished. For example: "We were waiting for the bus when it began to rain."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

We were waiting for that.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"We were waiting for hours.

We were waiting for it".

News & Media

The Guardian

We were waiting," McCarthy said.

News & Media

The Guardian

We were waiting for them.

We were waiting every day to die.

News & Media

Independent

After all, we were waiting for pie!

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

BioWare, we're waiting.

We're waiting.

News & Media

The New York Times

We are waiting.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We are waiting, just waiting".

News & Media

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we were waiting", ensure the context clearly indicates what you were waiting for. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "we was waiting", as it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "we were waiting", using the plural form of the verb 'to be'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were waiting" functions as a verb phrase in the past continuous tense, indicating an action of waiting that was in progress at a specific time in the past. This is supported by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

11%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we were waiting" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe a continuous action of anticipation in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts. Predominantly found in news and media, it also appears in scientific and formal business settings. To ensure clarity, specify what was being waited for and avoid the common error of using "we was waiting". Consider alternatives like "we were expecting" or "we had been anticipating" to add nuance to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "we were waiting" in a sentence?

You can use "we were waiting" to describe a past continuous action of anticipating something, for example: "We were waiting for the bus when it started to rain".

What are some alternatives to "we were waiting"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "we were expecting", "we had been anticipating", or "we were awaiting".

Is it correct to say "we was waiting"?

No, "we was waiting" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "we were waiting".

What's the difference between "we were waiting" and "we waited"?

"We were waiting" implies a continuous action in the past, while "we waited" suggests a completed action. For instance, "We waited for an hour" indicates the waiting is over, but "We were waiting for an hour" suggests the waiting may or may not be complete.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: