Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were talking
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"we were talking" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you are talking about an event that took place in the past, or when you are continuing a conversation that you were having. Example: We were talking about what we wanted to do for our vacation when the phone rang.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
we had a discussion
we had stressed
we were conversing
we were speaking
we had referred
we engaged in conversation
we communicated
we were discussed
we had participated
we were waiting
we have talked
we were debating
we had a chat
we talked
we were discussing
we were shopping
we had spoken
we conferred
we had a conversation
we discussed
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
"We were talking".
News & Media
We were talking and watching.
News & Media
"We were talking earlier.
News & Media
"We were talking, smoking.
News & Media
At least we were talking.
News & Media
We were talking about camels.
News & Media
We were talking about books.
News & Media
We were talking about cars.
News & Media
"We were talking Social Security.
News & Media
We were talking about Ashcroft".
News & Media
We were talking about friends.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were talking" to describe an ongoing conversation in the past, setting the scene or providing context for subsequent events. For example, "We were talking about the new project when the manager walked in."
Common error
Avoid starting too many sentences or paragraphs with "we were talking" in a narrative. Vary your sentence structure by using other descriptive verbs or setting the scene without explicitly stating the conversation was occurring. Instead of saying "We were talking about the weather, and then it started raining", try "As we discussed the unusual warmth, the first drops began to fall."
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were talking" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating an ongoing conversation in the past. It sets the scene for providing additional details about the topic, participants, or circumstances surrounding the discussion. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage in English.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Science
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "we were talking" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to indicate that a conversation occurred in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and commonly used in English. Predominantly found in news and media sources, "we were talking" sets the stage for further details about the discussion. For more formal contexts, consider using synonyms like "we were discussing", while informal settings may allow for options like "we chatted". When writing, ensure to avoid overusing it as a narrative crutch and vary your sentence structures to maintain reader engagement.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we spoke
This alternative offers a direct and simple substitute using a synonym to "talking".
we were discussing
This alternative uses a more formal verb, "discussing", to indicate a conversation about a specific topic.
we had a discussion
Replaces the continuous verb form with a noun phrase, emphasizing the event of the discussion.
we had a conversation
This alternative uses a noun-based construction instead of the verb-based "we were talking".
we were in conversation
This alternative uses a prepositional phrase to describe the state of having a conversation.
we engaged in conversation
This is a more formal and elaborate way of saying "we were talking", emphasizing the act of engaging in a conversation.
we communicated
This alternative uses a broader verb, "communicated", which encompasses various forms of exchanging information.
we chatted
This alternative uses a more informal verb, "chatted", suggesting a light and friendly conversation.
we were conferring
This alternative suggest a more formal and deliberate conversation, often for decision-making.
we exchanged words
This alternative highlights the act of exchanging words rather than the content of the conversation.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "we were talking" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "we were discussing", "we engaged in conversation", or "we had a discussion". These options often suit professional or academic contexts better.
What's a more casual way to say "we were talking"?
If you're aiming for a relaxed and informal tone, you could say "we chatted", "we spoke", or simply "we were chatting".
Is it always necessary to specify what "we were talking" about?
While not always required, specifying the topic of conversation after "we were talking" often adds clarity and context. For example, "we were talking about the project". Without it, the phrase can feel incomplete.
What are some common phrases used with "we were talking"?
Common phrases used with "we were talking" include stating the topic (e.g., "we were talking about"), the setting (e.g., "we were talking earlier"), or the purpose (e.g., "we were talking to each other").
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested