Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were supporting
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"we were supporting" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is the past continuous tense of the verb "support" and is used to describe an action or state that was ongoing in the past. Example: We were supporting our colleague's decision to take a risk and start her own business.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
38 human-written examples
"We were supporting Beats International: Norman Cook and Lindy Layton.
News & Media
"We were supporting this man Osama bin Laden.
News & Media
"It was the same for her, and we were supporting each other".
News & Media
There was not much talking, but still we were supporting each other.
News & Media
"We could work in many fields and we were supporting each other.
News & Media
"We were not supporting an outcome or a party, but we were supporting the process".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
21 human-written examples
"It felt like we were supported and cared for".
News & Media
We were given what we needed, and we were supported.
Science
We're supporting that".
News & Media
We are supporting it".
News & Media
"We are supporting him".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we were supporting", ensure the context clearly indicates who "we" refers to and what was being supported. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "we were supporting" without specifying the object or cause being supported. For instance, instead of saying "We were supporting", specify "We were supporting the new initiative" to provide complete information.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were supporting" functions as a verb phrase indicating a past continuous action. It specifies that a group ("we") was actively providing assistance, endorsement, or resources to someone or something over a period of time. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating this.
Frequent in
News & Media
79%
Formal & Business
12%
Science
9%
Less common in
Reference
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "we were supporting" is a grammatically sound and commonly used verb phrase indicating an ongoing action of providing aid, advocacy, or resources in the past. Ludwig's AI confirms its grammatical correctness and provides numerous examples from reputable sources, such as The New York Times and The Guardian, where it appears frequently. The phrase typically functions to convey past actions of backing a cause, justifying decisions, or explaining prior situations. It maintains a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal contexts. While "we were supporting" is widely applicable, clarity can be improved by explicitly stating who "we" refers to and what was being supported.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were aiding
Replaces "supporting" with "aiding", suggesting a more direct form of assistance.
we were assisting
Uses "assisting" instead of "supporting", highlighting the act of helping.
we were backing
Substitutes "supporting" with "backing", implying endorsement or giving confidence.
we were advocating
Replaces "supporting" with "advocating", which suggests actively promoting a cause or idea.
we were championing
Uses "championing" in place of "supporting", indicating strong and public support.
we were endorsing
Replaces "supporting" with "endorsing", implying formal approval or recommendation.
we were promoting
Substitutes "supporting" with "promoting", highlighting efforts to increase awareness or acceptance.
we were upholding
Replaces "supporting" with "upholding", suggesting maintaining or defending something.
we were fostering
Uses "fostering" instead of "supporting", which implies nurturing or encouraging something to grow.
we were facilitating
Replaces "supporting" with "facilitating", indicating making something easier or more likely to happen.
FAQs
How can I use "we were supporting" in a sentence?
Use "we were supporting" to describe an action of providing assistance, approval, or encouragement that was ongoing in the past. For example, "We were supporting the local charity with regular donations".
What are some alternatives to "we were supporting"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "we were aiding", "we were assisting", or "we were backing".
Is it correct to say "we are supporting" instead of "we were supporting"?
The choice between "we are supporting" and "we were supporting" depends on the timeframe. "We are supporting" indicates present action, while "we were supporting" refers to an action that was ongoing in the past. For example, "we are supporting the campaign now" versus "we were supporting the campaign last year".
What's the difference between "we supported" and "we were supporting"?
"We supported" indicates a completed action in the past, whereas "we were supporting" suggests an ongoing action in the past. For example, "we supported the team last year" implies a one-time or finished action, while "we were supporting the team throughout the season" implies ongoing support.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested