Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were seeing

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we were seeing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an ongoing action or experience in the past, often in the context of observing or experiencing something together with others. Example: "During our vacation last summer, we were seeing beautiful landscapes every day."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We were seeing positive results," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

We were seeing it on TV.

News & Media

The New Yorker

We knew we were seeing something extraordinary".

We were seeing two different realities.

We loved what we were seeing.

We were seeing a greater focus.

News & Media

The Guardian

We could scarcely believe what we were seeing.

We were seeing it all at once, all together.

"And in southern Europe, we were seeing minus growth".

I know they weren't seeing what we were seeing.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"It was not real, yet we were seeing it".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we were seeing" to describe a shared observation or experience that happened over a period of time in the past. It implies a continuous or repeated action.

Common error

Avoid using "we were seeing" to describe events that happened at a single, distinct moment in the past. Use a simple past tense verb instead, such as "we saw."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were seeing" primarily functions as a verb phrase in the past continuous tense. It indicates an ongoing action or experience that the speakers were observing or undergoing at some point in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its standard grammatical function based on common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Academia

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we were seeing" is a versatile phrase used to describe ongoing observations or experiences in the past, often implying a trend or pattern. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in News & Media. When writing, remember that this phrase is best used for continuous actions and not for single, distinct events. While generally neutral in tone, the specific context dictates its level of formality. Alternatives such as "we observed" or "we noticed" can offer subtle shifts in meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "we were seeing" in a sentence?

Use "we were seeing" to describe ongoing observations or experiences in the past. For example, "During that period, "we were seeing" significant improvements in performance".

What can I say instead of "we were seeing"?

You can use alternatives like "we observed", "we noticed", or "we witnessed" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "we were seeing" or "we saw"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. "We were seeing" describes an ongoing or repeated action in the past, while "we saw" describes a single, completed action.

What's the difference between "we were seeing" and "we had seen"?

"We were seeing" describes a continuous action in the past, while "we had seen" describes an action that was completed before another point in the past.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: