Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were had
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were had" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express that someone has been deceived or tricked in some way. Example: "After realizing the truth about the scam, I felt embarrassed that we were had by such a simple con."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
TechCrunch
Alternative expressions(20)
we were fooled
we were deceived
we were tricked
we were removed
we were received
we were approved
we were considered
we were left
we were incorporated
we were tired
we were involved
we were sorry
we were given
we were intrigued
we were shocked
we were flabbergasted
we were drained
we were beat
we were finished
we were kosher
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
"But after we were had to take Ramsey and Flamini off, it was too much for us to hope that we could score six.
News & Media
"After we were had to take Ramsey and Flamini off, it was too much for us to hope we could score six," he said.
News & Media
"I was told by investors if we were had moved from Newport Beach to Silicon Valley, we would have raised twice as much and sold for lots more".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
We were having spaghetti.
News & Media
We were having terrific fun.
News & Media
We were having fun, too".
News & Media
We were having success," Gathitu said.
News & Media
We were having a Greek eurozone crisis".
News & Media
"There we were, having caviar before.
News & Media
We were having a moment there".
News & Media
"We were having so much fun together".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were had" to succinctly express that a group was successfully deceived or tricked. It is particularly effective when highlighting a shared experience of being outsmarted.
Common error
Avoid using "we were had" in active voice constructions. The phrase is inherently passive, so attempting to use it actively (e.g., "We had them") changes the meaning entirely and can lead to confusion.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
"We were had" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject ("we") was the recipient of an action (being tricked or deceived). As Ludwig explains, it's a succinct way to express successful deception. This phrase appears in news and media contexts, where conveying concise information is essential.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
TechCrunch
33%
Science
0%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we were had" is a grammatically sound, though somewhat informal, way to express that a group was tricked or deceived. Ludwig confirms its correctness. While less formal than alternatives like "we were deceived", its appearance in news sources demonstrates its acceptability in a broad range of communications. Use it to succinctly convey that a group experienced deception, but be mindful of the context and audience to ensure appropriate formality. The most common mistake is misusing the phrase in active constructions. The phrase is more frequent in "News & Media" contexts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were deceived
Replaces "had" with the more formal "deceived", emphasizing the act of being misled.
we were tricked
Substitutes "had" with "tricked", highlighting the element of cunning or deceit.
we were fooled
Uses "fooled" instead of "had", suggesting a lack of awareness or intelligence on the part of those deceived.
we were conned
Replaces "had" with "conned", implying a fraudulent or manipulative scheme.
we were swindled
Employs "swindled" instead of "had", indicating a financial deception or fraud.
we fell for it
Shifts the focus to the action of succumbing to the deception, rather than the act itself.
we were taken in
Uses the phrasal verb "taken in" to express being deceived, suggesting a gradual or subtle deception.
we were duped
Replaces "had" with "duped", which suggests a simpler, more straightforward deception.
we were cheated
Uses "cheated" to indicate a violation of trust or fairness in the deception.
we got scammed
Uses "scammed" to convey the idea of being targeted by a fraudulent scheme or operation.
FAQs
How can I use "we were had" in a sentence?
Use "we were had" to indicate that a group of people were tricked or deceived. For example, "After the deal fell through, we realized "we were had" by a con artist".
What can I say instead of "we were had"?
You can use alternatives like "we were deceived", "we were tricked", or "we were fooled" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "we were had"?
Yes, "we were had" is a grammatically correct and idiomatic way to express that a group was tricked or deceived. It's a more informal way of saying "we were deceived".
What's the difference between "we were had" and "we had"?
"We were had" indicates that a group was tricked, while "we had" simply means that a group possessed something in the past. The passive construction changes the meaning entirely.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested