Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we still needed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"we still needed" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "We had tried to fix the problem ourselves, but we still needed professional help."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

We still needed to get inside the base.

News & Media

The New York Times

We still needed a few shots in close-up of him swimming and getting into difficulties.

Yet we still needed speed to clear a Staten Island Ferry as its engines churned for departure.

But in a game we dominated, we still needed the referee making the right call to get the win.

So, towards the end of the game we still needed to score another to have any hope of staying up.

So for the inside sales teams, we still needed to be distributed, but distributed in a co-located fashion.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

"We still need lighthouses".

News & Media

The New York Times

We still need more staff.

News & Media

The Guardian

But we still need projects.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"We still need to fix Europe.

News & Media

The New York Times

We still need to rub along together.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we still needed", ensure the context clearly indicates what was lacking or required and why it was important.

Common error

Avoid using "we still needed" without clearly establishing what "we" refers to and what the specific need was. Ambiguity can confuse readers.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we still needed" functions as a statement of continued requirement or necessity in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct. Examples show it commonly introduces what was lacking despite other actions or conditions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Academia

24%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we still needed" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to convey a persistent necessity or requirement in the past, as validated by Ludwig AI. It often appears in news articles, academic papers, and other forms of writing to highlight an unmet need despite prior efforts or existing circumstances. The phrase's versatility allows it to fit into various contexts, though clarity regarding the subject and the specific need is essential for effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use "we still needed" in a sentence?

Use "we still needed" to indicate a requirement or lack of something even after some progress or effort. For example, "We secured funding, but "we still needed" a skilled project manager".

What are some alternatives to "we still needed"?

You can use alternatives like "we still required", "we remained in need of", or "our needs were not yet met" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "we still need" instead of "we still needed"?

The choice between "we still need" and ""we still needed"" depends on the timeframe. Use "we still need" for present or future needs, and "we still needed" for past needs.

What's the difference between "we needed" and "we still needed"?

"We needed" simply states a past requirement. "We still needed" implies that despite previous actions or circumstances, the need persisted.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: