we should review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we should review" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when suggesting that a group or individual examine or assess something together. Example: "Before we finalize the project, we should review the feedback we received from the client."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

"I think we should review that entire policy," he said.

The New Yorker

More generally, perhaps, we should review the principle that greater transparency always serves a democratic purpose, no matter how intuitively correct it might seem.

The Guardian - Opinion

What we have done in Britain so far is we have suspended projects with security forces, we have revoked a number of export licences and I think among European countries we should review together how we try to aid Egypt.

The Guardian

"I've lived with this issue for a very long time, and I decided it was something that we should review, and that could strengthen the S.E.C.'s enforcement hand".

The New York Times

So to see whether a financial education curriculum is likely to pay dividends, we should review specific efforts to shore up financial skills in those who are deficient, and not just measure what people already know.

The New York Times

For one thing, we should review the estimated $50 billion a year we now spend to maintain a military presence in the Persian Gulf, not counting the costs of the wars we've been fighting in the region.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Up until now there have been three "piles," if you will: 1) shit I want to keep for myself, regardless if we review it or not; 2) releases that I personally want to review or assign to someone whose taste I trust; 3) something we probably should review because someone in the office is boning the guitar player, impregnated someone, or owes a drummer $50.

Vice

ODD COUPLE: Here at the Book Review, intuition and free association play big roles when we decide who should review the books we send out.

The New York Times - Books

"There's no point in throwing stones at judge who act independently, but we can and should review the system to ensure that fundamental rights are protected," they said in a statement.

The Guardian

Each primary reviewer should review each record.

BMJ Open

We believe the company should review its approach to outsourcing throughout the business.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we should review", be specific about what needs to be reviewed and why. This provides clarity and purpose to the suggestion.

Common error

Avoid using "we should review" without specifying the subject or the goals of the review. This can lead to confusion and inefficiency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we should review" functions as a suggestion or recommendation for a group to examine or assess something. As Ludwig illustrates, this phrase is often used in contexts where a policy, document, or situation requires evaluation.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we should review" is a grammatically sound phrase used to suggest a collaborative examination or assessment. Ludwig provides examples across News & Media, Science, and Business contexts, indicating its applicability in various scenarios. The phrase is best used when specifying the subject of the review to avoid ambiguity. Based on the provided analysis, while Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, understanding the context and intended purpose is key to its effective use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we need to reassess

Emphasizes the necessity of reassessment, making the suggestion stronger.

we ought to re-examine

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a sense of duty or obligation.

let's revisit

Proposes revisiting a topic, using a more informal and collaborative tone.

it is important to re-evaluate

Highlights the importance of re-evaluation, changing the emphasis.

it is advisable to reassess

Implies a recommendation for reassessment, differing in tone and formality.

it would be prudent to reconsider

Emphasizes the prudence of reconsidering something, changing the tone.

a re-examination is warranted

Suggests that a re-examination is justified or necessary, altering the structure.

it merits further scrutiny

Indicates that something deserves careful and thorough examination, altering the formality and emphasis.

it's worth taking another look at

Suggests that something deserves another look, using a more casual tone.

a review is in order

Indicates that a review is appropriate or necessary, using a more idiomatic expression.

FAQs

How do I use "we should review" in a sentence?

Use "we should review" to suggest a formal examination or assessment of something. For example, "Before launching the campaign, "we should review" the marketing plan."

What can I say instead of "we should review"?

You can use alternatives like "we ought to re-examine", "we need to reassess", or "let's revisit" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "we should review" in a formal setting?

It is appropriate when suggesting a necessary or beneficial examination of policies, documents, or procedures. This phrase is suitable for professional communication.

What's the difference between "we should review" and "we should revise"?

"We should review" suggests an examination to understand, while "we should revise" implies making changes to improve something. Reviewing precedes revising.