Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we have included
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we have included" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to emphasize that something has been included in a document or conversation. For example, "In our report, we have included the latest research on the topic."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Should we have included Stella Gibson or Ellie Miller?
News & Media
"We have included everything that makes sense," Mr Michaelis said.
News & Media
Which of your favourites should we have included?
News & Media
We have included results for values of.
Therefore, we have included this scale.
(We have included the full blog post below).
News & Media
As a comparison, we have included the corresponding pristine cases.
Science
We have included it for the reader's convenience.
Results We have included 10 children on ECMO.
Science
(2011), we have included required formulas here too.
We have included 30 patients with septic shock.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we have included", ensure that what you are including is clearly defined and relevant to the context. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "we have included" excessively if it makes your writing sound passive. Sometimes, a more direct and active construction can improve clarity and engagement. For example, instead of "We have included the data in Appendix A", try "The data is in Appendix A".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we have included" primarily functions as a transitive verb phrase, indicating that the subject ('we') has performed the action of including something within a defined scope. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and widespread usability.
Frequent in
Science
63%
News & Media
22%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Social Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we have included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression across diverse contexts. Ludwig AI affirms its validity for emphasizing the incorporation of specific elements within a larger scope. Primarily functioning as a transitive verb phrase, it serves to inform readers about the included components, ensuring clarity and transparency. Its usage spans across various fields such as science, news, and formal communication, reflecting its versatility and general applicability. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context clearly defines the included elements to enhance understanding and prevent ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we incorporated
Suggests a more integrated inclusion, where the added element becomes a functional part of the whole.
we added
Focuses on the action of adding something, implying a more straightforward addition without necessarily emphasizing a comprehensive inclusion.
we integrated
Suggests the action of blending elements together into a unified whole.
we encompassed
Implies a broader scope of inclusion, covering a wide range of elements or aspects.
we comprised
Indicates that something is made up of specific components, highlighting the constituent parts.
we covered
Indicates that a topic has been comprehensively addressed or dealt with.
we contained
Emphasizes the presence of something within a defined space or set, focusing on containment rather than the act of inclusion.
we involved
Highlights the incorporation of elements in a process or activity.
we featured
Highlights something as a prominent or noteworthy element within a larger context.
we listed
Focuses on the act of creating a list, emphasizing the arrangement or enumeration of items.
FAQs
How can I use "we have included" in a sentence?
Use "we have included" to indicate that something is part of a larger collection or document. For example, "We have included all relevant data in this report".
What are some alternatives to saying "we have included"?
You can use alternatives such as "we added", "we incorporated", or "we featured" depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "we included" or "we have included"?
"We included" and "we have included" are both grammatically correct, but "we have included" implies a present relevance or ongoing state resulting from the inclusion. The choice depends on the context.
What's the difference between "we have included" and "we have excluded"?
"We have included" means something is part of a set, while "we have excluded" means something is intentionally left out.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested