we have excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we have excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that certain items, individuals, or options have been left out or not considered in a particular context. Example: "In our analysis of the survey results, we have excluded responses that were incomplete or irrelevant."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

If we have excluded all known infectious agents we would be justified in proceeding with trials in patients.

The New York Times - Health

Anything goes – so long as it's in English (once again, to keep things manageable, we have excluded translations).

The Guardian - Books

"We are publishing the names of 16 of those that we have excluded since October.

Independent

Doug Pascover, a regular at the DIA table, notes that we have excluded third-party candidates from the mix.

The Economist

18For technical reasons, we have excluded websites requiring pre-registration.

IZA Journal of Labor Economics

These deal with uncertainty concerns that we have excluded.

Journal of Cloud Computing

With this approach, we have excluded (11text347) articles and (2text359) authors from our analysis.

EPJ Data Science

These "cryptic consumers" (Keesing 2000) also increased in plots from which we have excluded large herbivores.

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

We have excluded these overlapping signatures and only considered the SRI signatures.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

We have excluded papers pertaining to areas such as paper industry, textile industry, and municipal waste management.

IFAC-PapersOnLine

In Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, United States and other countries, we have excluded payments made to crowdfunding campaigns from our buyer protection programs.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we have excluded", clearly state the reason for the exclusion to maintain transparency and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "we have excluded" without specifying what was excluded and why. Always provide context to ensure the reader understands the scope and rationale behind the exclusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we have excluded" functions as an active voice construction used to explicitly state the omission of certain elements. It's commonly employed to define the scope of analysis or investigation, signaling what has been deliberately left out. Ludwig examples confirm its widespread use in academic and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we have excluded" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression for explicitly stating the omission of specific elements in a particular context. Ludwig AI validates that it typically serves to provide clarity and transparency, particularly in scientific and formal writing. When employing this phrase, ensure that the scope and rationale for the exclusion are clearly articulated to avoid ambiguity and maintain transparency.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we have omitted

Replaces "excluded" with a more formal synonym, suggesting a deliberate act of leaving something out.

we did not include

Emphasizes the action of not incorporating something, providing a straightforward substitute.

we have left out

Offers a more informal alternative to "excluded", implying a simpler act of omission.

we have discounted

Implies that something was not taken into account, often because it was considered unreliable or insignificant.

we have disregarded

Suggests that something was consciously ignored because it was deemed irrelevant or unimportant.

we have factored out

Suggests removing a variable or element from consideration in an analysis or equation.

we have removed

Focuses on the act of taking something away, contrasting with the initial act of not including.

we have bypassed

Indicates that something was avoided or skipped over, implying a deliberate choice to not engage with it.

we have set aside

Suggests that something was put to the side, out of the focus scope.

we have bypassed

Indicates a deliberate act of going around or avoiding something.

FAQs

How can I use "we have excluded" in a sentence?

Use "we have excluded" to indicate that specific items, data, or individuals have been deliberately left out of a particular context or analysis. For example, "In our study, "we have excluded" participants who did not meet the inclusion criteria".

What are some alternatives to "we have excluded"?

You can use alternatives like "we have omitted", "we have left out", or "we did not include" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "we have excluded" in writing?

It's appropriate when you need to clearly state that certain elements were intentionally not included in your analysis, study, or discussion. This helps to define the boundaries of your work and the reasons for those boundaries.

What's the difference between "we have excluded" and "we have ignored"?

"We have excluded" implies a deliberate act of leaving something out, often with a specific reason. "We have ignored", on the other hand, suggests that something was overlooked or disregarded, possibly unintentionally. The former indicates a conscious choice, while the latter may imply negligence or irrelevance.