Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we have followed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"we have followed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about something that has happened in the past that has been the result of your actions. For example: "We have followed the instructions given to us and completed the project on time."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
we have become aware
we have complied
our analysis reveals
we have enumerated
we have progressed
we have ignored
we noticed
we have recognized
we have continued
we have overseen
we have searched
we have monitored
it has come to our attention
we saw
we have acknowledged
we understand that
we investigated
we have mentioned
we have congratulated
we have anticipated
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Therefore, to make this SAM balanced we have followed following two steps.
We have followed him.
News & Media
We have followed all the leads.
News & Media
We have followed the revisionist path before.
News & Media
Here, we have followed a similar procedure.
Science & Research
"I think we have followed a steady path.
News & Media
We have followed Russia's lead in building arms.
News & Media
"We have followed a traditional paradigm," Moddelmog told me.
News & Media
We have followed these procedures in this matter".
News & Media
We have followed Mr. Mack's Pepsi-Cola and Nedicks career.
News & Media
For illustration purposes we have followed the recommended guidelines.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we have followed" to clearly indicate that your actions were guided by a specific set of instructions, procedures, or examples. This emphasizes accountability and adherence to established guidelines.
Common error
Avoid using "we are following" when "we have followed" is more appropriate. The present perfect tense (have followed) indicates a completed action with relevance to the present, whereas the present continuous (are following) implies an ongoing action.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we have followed" typically functions as the main verb phrase in a sentence, indicating a past action that has been completed and has relevance to the present. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.
Frequent in
Science
37%
News & Media
35%
Academia
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we have followed" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate adherence to a specific procedure, guideline, or path. It's versatile, fitting well in science, news, and academic contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. When writing, make sure to use "we have followed" to highlight compliance and demonstrate accountability. Also, remember to use the correct tense. Although there are various alternatives available such as ""we observed"", ""we tracked"" or ""we adhered to"", the best choice always depends on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we tracked
This suggests a systematic monitoring of progress or movement, implying careful observation and data collection.
we monitored
Focuses on regular checks and observations, usually involving data collection and analysis.
we observed
This alternative focuses on the act of watching and noticing, emphasizing visual tracking rather than adherence to a method.
we took note of
This emphasizes the act of paying attention and recording information, suggesting a passive observation.
we adhered to
This emphasizes compliance with rules or guidelines, shifting the focus from observation to obedience.
we complied with
Similar to "we adhered to", this highlights conforming to regulations or standards.
we kept pace with
This suggests an effort to stay aligned with a development or trend, emphasizing concurrency and responsiveness.
we heeded
Indicates paying attention to advice or warnings, implying a cautious and responsive approach.
we investigated
Implies a thorough and systematic inquiry, moving beyond simple observation to active examination.
we emulated
Suggests imitating or copying a model or example, emphasizing replication rather than mere observation.
FAQs
How can I use "we have followed" in a sentence?
Use "we have followed" to indicate that you have adhered to a specific set of guidelines, instructions, or a particular path. For example, "We have followed the instructions provided in the manual."
What are some alternatives to "we have followed"?
Depending on the context, alternatives to "we have followed" include "we observed", "we tracked", or "we adhered to".
What's the difference between "we have followed" and "we are following"?
"We have followed" indicates a completed action, meaning you have already adhered to something. "We are following" indicates an ongoing action, meaning you are currently in the process of adhering to something.
Is "we have followed by" grammatically correct?
While grammatically correct, "we have followed by" may sound awkward. It's often better to rephrase using "we have followed with" or another more natural-sounding alternative.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested