we are equal

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we are equal" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to express the idea that two or more people have an equal status, or that a situation is fair and just. For example: "Gender should never be a factor in determining pay; we are all equal in terms of our capabilities and contributions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It is not equality in political terms, but certainly we are equal in individual terms.

BBC

We are equal".

The New York Times

We are equal, but separate".

The New Yorker

I think, OK we are equal.

The Guardian

We are equal, all of us!

The New York Times

We are equal before God, yes, but there are limits".

The New Yorker

We must prove we are equal to that challenge".

The New York Times

We are equal in dreams – underdogs and over achievers.

The Guardian - Books

Using the same word means we are equal.

The Guardian

The idea that we are equal is fiction.

The Guardian

Hearing people think we can't do anything – but we are equal".

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we are equal" to assert a fundamental right or principle, such as in discussions of social justice or human rights.

Common error

Avoid using "we are equal" in contexts where specific skills or attributes differ significantly. It is most effective when referring to inherent rights, status, or opportunity, rather than suggesting identical capabilities in all areas.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we are equal" functions as a declarative statement asserting equality between two or more entities. It is commonly used to affirm equal rights, opportunities, or status. As Ludwig AI states, it is grammatically correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Formal & Business

18%

Science

13%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we are equal" is a grammatically sound and highly prevalent expression used to assert equality, fairness, or parity. According to Ludwig AI, it is correct and usable in various written contexts. It sees common usage across news, business and science. When employing the phrase, be mindful of the specific context to ensure that it accurately reflects the intended meaning. Alternative phrases, such as "we are equivalent", may offer subtle differences in connotation that enhance precision. The examples shown above further highlight the contexts in which this expression is found.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we are equivalent

Replaces "equal" with "equivalent", suggesting a similar level or value but with a slightly more formal tone.

we are on par

Uses the idiom "on par" to indicate that something is at the same level or standard.

we are evenly matched

Emphasizes the balance of skills or qualities between parties, implying a fair contest or comparison.

we are of the same standing

Indicates that individuals or groups have the same status or position.

we are of equal merit

Focuses on the comparable worth or value that individuals or items possess.

we are at the same level

Highlights the similarity in rank, proficiency, or stage of development.

we are a match

Implies the same degree of suitability and fitness.

we are the same

Uses a broader statement to indicate identity in attributes or qualities.

we are in the same boat

Indicates a shared situation, though not necessarily one of strict equality.

we are up to the challenge

Conveys an idea of being capable or adequate for the task, rather than strictly equal in all aspects.

FAQs

How can I use "we are equal" in a sentence?

You can use "we are equal" to express the idea that people have the same rights, status, or opportunities. For example: "In the eyes of the law, "we are equal"."

What's the difference between "we are equal" and "we are the same"?

"We are equal" emphasizes fairness and equivalent status, while "we are the same" implies identical qualities or characteristics. For example, you may say ""we are equal" before the law" but not necessarily "we are the same".

What can I say instead of "we are equal"?

You can use alternatives like "we are equivalent", "we are on par", or "we are evenly matched" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always accurate to say "we are equal"?

While it is a powerful statement for advocating for rights and fairness, it is important to consider the context. In terms of skills, experience or physical attributes, ""we are equal"" might not always be factually accurate, but it can still be used to express the belief that all people should have the same opportunities.