we all recognized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we all recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a shared acknowledgment or understanding among a group of people regarding a particular fact or situation. Example: "During the meeting, we all recognized the importance of addressing the issue promptly."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

"We all recognized that it was too ambitious," he said.

The Washington Post

But we all recognized that storytelling is agnostic.

The New York Times - Magazine

"We all recognized just how uncomfortable it was to sit in a wet brief.

The New Yorker

"The guys in here weren't oblivious; we all recognized that Wash made a mistake," Young said.

The New York Times - Sports

"We all recognized him," Cathy Lazansky, one of the jurors, said about spotting Mr. Dunne across the courtroom.

The New York Times - Arts

Joshua: And so, in this moment that we all recognized was was a was a bounded one, right?

Princeton University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

"I think we can all recognize a disturbed and distraught woman when we see one".

The New York Times

We are all recognized and "branded" by the qualities or flaws that make up our being.

Forbes

We all recognize that experience".

The New York Times

("We all recognize the problem," he said).

The New York Times

"We all recognize that we need to do something.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we all recognized" when you want to emphasize a shared understanding or acknowledgement within a specific group. It implies that the understanding was clear and apparent to everyone involved.

Common error

While "we all recognized" is generally acceptable, avoid overusing it in highly formal or academic writing. Consider more precise alternatives like "it was generally agreed" or "there was a consensus" for a more sophisticated tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we all recognized" functions as a statement of shared perception or understanding. It indicates that a group of people collectively acknowledged or understood a particular fact, situation, or characteristic. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Academia

18%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we all recognized" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate shared understanding or acknowledgement within a group. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to convey agreement and awareness, frequently preceding an action or conclusion based on this shared perception. While generally neutral in tone, formal alternatives exist for academic or business contexts. The phrase appears most frequently in news and media sources, underlining its versatile applicability in various writing styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we all acknowledged

Substitutes "recognized" with "acknowledged", emphasizing a formal acceptance or awareness.

we all understood

Replaces "recognized" with "understood", highlighting comprehension rather than just awareness.

we were all aware

Replaces "recognized" with "were all aware", emphasizing a state of being informed.

everyone acknowledged

Replaces "we" with "everyone", shifting the focus to a broader group while maintaining the sense of shared agreement.

we jointly perceived

Uses "jointly perceived" for a more formal and emphatic way of saying "we all recognized".

we all appreciated

Substitutes "recognized" with "appreciated", indicating a shared understanding of value or importance.

it was generally agreed

Changes the structure to a passive construction, focusing on the agreement rather than the group recognizing it.

there was a collective understanding

Shifts the focus to the "collective understanding" itself, rather than the act of recognizing.

we concurred

Replaces the entire phrase with a single verb, indicating agreement or shared opinion.

we were of one mind

Expresses a complete agreement and shared perspective on a matter.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "we all recognized"?

You can use alternatives like "everyone acknowledged", "we all acknowledged", or "we all understood" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "we all recognized" formal or informal?

"We all recognized" is generally considered neutral in formality. It's suitable for most contexts, but more formal options like "it was generally agreed" may be preferable in academic or business writing.

How to use "we all recognized" in a sentence?

Use "we all recognized" to indicate a shared understanding or awareness among a group. For example, "We all recognized the need for immediate action" or "We all recognized his talent and potential."

What's the difference between "we all recognized" and "we all knew"?

"We all recognized" implies a clear and apparent understanding, while "we all knew" suggests a factual awareness, potentially without full comprehension. "We all recognized" the problem suggests we understood its implications; "we all knew" the problem simply means we were aware of its existence.