was well described

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was well described" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been accurately and thoroughly explained or characterized in the past. Example: "The process was well described in the manual, making it easy for users to follow."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The characters were well written, funny and real and the setting was well described.

The Guardian - Books

For much of human history, life was well described by Thomas Hobbes as "nasty, brutish and short".

The Guardian - Opinion

Nixon, who became vice president at age 40, was well described as "an old man's idea of a young man".

The New York Times - Books

He was well described by Stevie Smith as "a poet in the English tradition, original without being freakish, contemporary without being fraudulent".

The Guardian - Books

The randomisation process was well described, using an accepted standardised balanced 4-block randomisation method.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Discussion Acenocoumarin overdose was well described in the literature, and the treatment is well codified.

Annals of Intensive Care

Relatively fast decolorization (40 min) process was well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetics.

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

This effect was well described by an exponential function (R2 > 99%).

Journal of Food Engineering

The Cu2+ adsorption kinetic was well described by the pseudo-second order kinetic model.

Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

In both processes, adsorption kinetic was well described by a chemical adsorption onto a heterogeneous surface.

Journal of Environmental Management

The adsorption process was well described by the pseudo-second-order model.

Chemical Engineering Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was well described", ensure the context clearly indicates what was being described and the source or method of description. This adds clarity and authority to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was well described" as a generic filler. Always specify what exactly was described and, if possible, by whom or where. This makes your writing more informative and credible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was well described" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject received a thorough and accurate depiction or explanation. As Ludwig AI explains, it commonly appears in academic and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was well described" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and news contexts. As Ludwig AI verifies, it's employed to convey that a subject has been thoroughly and accurately explained. While alternatives like "was accurately portrayed" or "was thoroughly explained" exist, the core meaning remains consistent. When using this phrase, ensure you provide adequate context and specify what was described and by whom to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was accurately portrayed

Replaces 'described' with 'portrayed', emphasizing the accuracy of the representation.

was thoroughly explained

Replaces 'described' with 'explained', focusing on the comprehensiveness of the explanation.

was clearly articulated

Replaces 'described' with 'articulated', highlighting the clarity of the expression.

was comprehensively detailed

Replaces 'well described' with a more emphatic phrase, stressing the level of detail.

was precisely defined

Replaces 'described' with 'defined', emphasizing accuracy and lack of ambiguity.

was vividly depicted

Replaces 'described' with 'depicted', emphasizing the visual or imaginative quality of the description.

was effectively characterized

Replaces 'described' with 'characterized', focusing on the features or qualities that were highlighted.

was faithfully rendered

Replaces 'described' with 'rendered', stressing the accuracy and truthfulness of the representation.

was aptly summarized

Replaces 'described' with 'summarized', highlighting the concise and fitting nature of the summary.

was skillfully presented

Replaces 'described' with 'presented', focusing on the skill and technique used in the description.

FAQs

How can I use "was well described" in a sentence?

Use "was well described" to indicate that something has been thoroughly and accurately explained or depicted. For example, "The experimental procedure "was well described" in the research paper".

What are some alternatives to "was well described"?

Alternatives include "was accurately portrayed", "was thoroughly explained", or "was clearly articulated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to say "was well described" or "is well described"?

Use "was well described" when referring to a description that occurred in the past. Use "is well described" when referring to a description that is currently available or generally known. For example, "The phenomenon is well described in scientific literature".

What does it mean when something "was well described"?

It means that a particular subject, process, or event has been explained or depicted with accuracy and thoroughness, leaving little room for ambiguity or misunderstanding.