Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was walked

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was walked" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe an action that has been completed. For example: The poodle was walked around the block by its owner.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Somehow, he was walked in four pitches.

News & Media

The New York Times

Jimmy Rollins was walked intentionally.

After Meluskey was walked intentionally, Truby singled.

Nancy was walked down the aisle by her parents.

News & Media

The New York Times

Every meal he was walked through to the table.

He smiled as he was walked from the courtroom.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Burnitz was walked intentionally to load the bases.

Edgardo Alfonzo, who was walked by Rodriguez, also scored.

Rodriguez was walked intentionally later in the fifth.

He moved to third on Asdrubal Cabrera's double, and Nick Swisher was walked intentionally.

Garrett Jones was walked intentionally before Doumit hit his second career grand slam.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was walked", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what is being walked. For instance, "The dog was walked by its owner" leaves no ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was walked" without a clearly defined subject. A sentence like "The prisoner was walked" leaves the reader wondering who performed the action. Instead, specify: "The prisoner was walked to the cell by the guard."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was walked" functions as the past passive form of the verb "walk". It indicates that the subject of the sentence received the action of being walked. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is grammatically sound and frequently observed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was walked" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction used to indicate that the subject received the action of walking. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's appropriate in various contexts, particularly within News & Media and scientific writing. When using the phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the agent performing the action when necessary. Alternative phrases like "was escorted" or "was led" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

FAQs

How is "was walked" used in a sentence?

"Was walked" indicates a passive action, meaning the subject received the action of being walked. For example, "The dog "was walked" by its owner".

What are some alternatives to "was walked"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "was escorted", "was guided", or "was led". Each carries a slightly different connotation.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was walked"?

Yes, "was walked" is grammatically correct as the past passive form of the verb "walk". It's used when the subject receives the action.

What's the difference between "was walked" and "walked"?

"Was walked" is in the passive voice, emphasizing the receiver of the action. "Walked" is in the active voice, emphasizing the doer of the action. For example: "The dog walked" (active) vs. "The dog "was walked"" (passive).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: