was viewed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was viewed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something was seen or observed by a particular person or group. Example: "The artwork was viewed by thousands of visitors during the exhibition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

That was viewed by investors as progress.

The New York Times

Gombert was viewed by his colleagues as an innovator.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Did she ever wonder if her public profile affected how she was viewed by her colleagues?

The Guardian

My second visit four months later was viewed by her as a second date.

The New York Times

Geller was viewed by most Republican leaders as an anti-Muslim extremist.

The New Yorker

It was viewed by some three million Iranians in the first twenty-four hours.

The New Yorker

From the beginning, "Chicago" was viewed by Miramax as a wager.

The New York Times

Some of the work was viewed by the Chinese government as distasteful or antiauthoritarian.

The New York Times - Arts

DuPont, which invented nylon, was viewed by some as squandering its research expertise.

The New York Times

"He was unconcerned with how he was viewed by others," he added.

The New York Times

By contrast, China's qualification Sunday was viewed by hundreds of millions on television there.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was viewed by", ensure the subject is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "The policy was viewed by the committee" instead of just "It was viewed."

Common error

Don't use "was viewed by" without specifying who did the viewing. Omitting this information makes the sentence vague and weakens its impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was viewed by" serves as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received the action of being observed or considered. As noted by Ludwig AI, this emphasizes the object or subject that is being perceived rather than the actor performing the viewing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

14%

Science

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was viewed by" is a grammatically sound and common passive construction used to express how something was perceived or observed. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Its prevalence in news, wiki, and scientific contexts suggests a neutral to formal register. While "was seen by" and "was regarded by" offer viable alternatives, clarity and context are key to effective usage. Avoiding ambiguity by specifying the viewer ensures the message remains clear and impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was seen by

Replaces "viewed" with the more general term "seen", indicating observation.

was observed by

Similar to "seen by" but can imply a more formal or scientific observation.

was regarded by

Focuses on the opinion or assessment held by someone.

was considered by

Emphasizes the act of deliberation or evaluation by someone.

was perceived by

Highlights how something was understood or interpreted by someone.

was noticed by

Indicates that something was observed or detected by someone.

was witnessed by

Suggests direct observation of an event by someone.

was inspected by

Emphasizes a careful and detailed examination by someone.

was examined by

Similar to "inspected by" but can also imply a medical or scientific context.

was scrutinized by

Highlights a critical and thorough evaluation by someone.

FAQs

How can I use "was viewed by" in a sentence?

Use "was viewed by" to indicate how something was perceived or observed by a specific group or individual. For example, "The new policy "was viewed by" the employees as a positive change".

What can I say instead of "was viewed by"?

You can use alternatives like "was seen by", "was regarded by", or "was considered by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was viewed by" or "viewed by"?

"Was viewed by" is the passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action. "Viewed by" lacks a verb and is incomplete without additional context.

What's the difference between "was viewed by" and "saw"?

"Was viewed by" is passive, emphasizing the object being viewed. "Saw" is active, emphasizing the person doing the viewing. For example, "The painting was viewed by the curator" vs. "The curator saw the painting".