was validated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was validated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been confirmed or approved, often in a formal or technical context. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated by an independent review board."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The model was validated through cross-validation.

Critical Care

This attitude was validated by tax data.

The New York Times

That decision was validated within two weeks.

The New York Times - Sports

The method was validated.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

The decision was validated by the Australian supreme court.

The Guardian - Opinion

The model was validated experimentally.

Optics & Laser Technology

The model was validated too.

Ultrasonics

This result was validated by the plaque assay.

Nature

Selected target was validated by RT-PCR or functional characterization.

Nature

The method was validated based on FDA criteria.

Nature

The quality of cross-dating was validated by program COFECHA38.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was validated", clearly state the method or criteria used for validation to provide context and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was validated" when the evidence is preliminary or weak. Instead, use phrases like "was suggested" or "was supported" to reflect the level of certainty.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was validated" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject has undergone a process of verification or confirmation. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

Academia

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was validated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and academic contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and its primary function is to assert the reliability or accuracy of something. When using "was validated", be sure to specify the method or criteria used for validation to provide better context. While common, avoid overstating validation when the evidence is weak. In summary, "was validated" is a strong choice for conveying confirmation or verification, especially in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been confirmed

Focuses on the act of confirming something previously uncertain.

was verified

Emphasizes the process of checking or proving the truth of something.

was substantiated

Highlights the provision of evidence to support a claim or finding.

was corroborated

Stresses the reinforcement of a statement or theory with additional evidence.

was authenticated

Indicates that something has been proven genuine.

was proven

Focuses on achieving a state of certainty through demonstration or evidence.

was affirmed

Suggests a declaration or confirmation of truth.

was ratified

Implies formal approval or confirmation, often in a legal or official context.

was endorsed

Indicates approval and support, often by an authority.

was accredited

Signals that a standard or quality has been officially recognized.

FAQs

How can I use "was validated" in a sentence?

You can use "was validated" to indicate that something has been confirmed or proven true. For example: "The experimental results "were validated" by an independent study."

What are some alternatives to "was validated"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was confirmed", "was verified", or "was substantiated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "was validated by" or "was validated with"?

"Was validated by" is generally preferred when the validation is performed by an entity. "Was validated with" is suitable when referring to the tools or methods used during validation.

What's the difference between "was validated" and "was verified"?

"Was validated" implies a process of confirming the accuracy or effectiveness of something, while "was verified" suggests checking or proving the truth of something. Validation often involves a broader scope than verification.