Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was treated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was treated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or approach taken to address a particular issue, condition, or situation, often in a medical or therapeutic context. Example: "The patient was treated with a combination of medication and physical therapy to improve their recovery."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was treated with steroid injections.

"I was treated with distance.

Good news was treated with horror.

All of it was treated with indifference.

He was treated with suspicion at first.

Hoggard's later spell was treated with disdain.

"He was treated with a little deference".

News & Media

The New York Times

She was treated with antibiotics and steroids.

She was treated with topical corticosteroids.

I was treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for this.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

The control group was treated with water.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was treated with", ensure the sentence clearly indicates what condition or ailment was being addressed. This provides context and clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid assuming the reader knows the specifics of the treatment. Always specify what the treatment involves to ensure clear communication and prevent ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was treated with" functions as a passive construction indicating the method or substance used to address a medical condition or other issue. As Ludwig AI explains, it's grammatically correct and usable in written English. The examples provided by Ludwig demonstrate its use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

39%

Academia

16%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was treated with" is a grammatically sound and very common way to describe the application of a treatment method, particularly in medical and scientific contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is most frequently found in scientific publications, news media, and academic writing. When using this phrase, clarity is key: specify the condition being addressed and the treatment applied. While alternatives like "was administered" or "was given" exist, "was treated with" offers a balance of formality and clarity that makes it suitable for various professional and informative settings.

FAQs

How can I use "was treated with" in a sentence?

Use "was treated with" to describe the specific method, medication, or therapy used to address a medical condition or situation. For example: "The patient "was treated with" antibiotics to combat the infection."

What are some alternatives to "was treated with"?

Some alternatives include "was administered", "was given", "received treatment involving", or "underwent therapy using". The best choice depends on the context and the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was treated with" in formal writing?

Yes, "was treated with" is suitable for formal writing, especially in medical or scientific contexts. It clearly and professionally conveys the treatment method used.

What's the difference between "was treated with" and "was managed with"?

"Was treated with" typically refers to a specific treatment or intervention, such as medication or surgery. "Was managed with" implies a broader approach involving multiple strategies and techniques. For instance, a condition "was managed with" lifestyle changes, medication, and therapy.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: