was treated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was treated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing medical treatment received for a specific condition or illness. Example: "He was treated for a severe allergic reaction at the hospital."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was treated for sinus.

Harvard University

Tunnell was treated for hypothermia and shock.

The New York Times - Sports

He was treated for a severe concussion.

The New York Times - Sports

He was treated for it.

The Guardian - Music

She was treated for cuts.

The New York Times

Lea was treated for injuries and released.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

One firefighter was treated for minor injuries.

The New York Times

Officer Dison was treated for minor injuries.

The New York Times

Earlier, Kournikova was treated for arm stiffness.

The New York Times - Sports

He was treated for minor injuries.

The New York Times

A third man was treated for shock.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To emphasize the ongoing nature of treatment, consider using phrases like "is currently being treated for" or "has been undergoing treatment for".

Common error

Do not use "was treated for" without specifying the condition, as it leaves the reader wondering what the treatment was for. Instead of saying "He was treated", specify "He was treated for a concussion."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was treated for" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received medical care or attention for a specific condition. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Academia

18%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

14%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was treated for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that someone received medical care for a specific condition. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and provides numerous examples from reputable sources. Predominantly found in news and academic contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse audiences. When using this phrase, clarity is key: always specify the condition being treated. Alternatives like "received treatment for" or "underwent therapy for" can add variety to your writing. Its high frequency and wide applicability make "was treated for" a reliable choice for conveying medical information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received medical attention for

Replaces "was treated" with "received medical attention", emphasizing the act of receiving care.

was given medication for

Specifies medication as the form of treatment, narrowing the scope.

underwent therapy for

Substitutes "was treated" with "underwent therapy", highlighting a therapeutic approach.

had care administered for

Emphasizes the administration of care rather than the treatment itself.

got medical care because of

Uses a more informal tone replacing "was treated" with "got medical care", and "for" with "because of".

sought treatment related to

Focuses on the act of seeking treatment and its relation to a specific condition.

obtained medical assistance due to

Highlights obtaining assistance because of a specific issue, with a formal tone.

benefited from medical intervention for

Highlights the positive outcome of medical intervention.

had a procedure done because of

Focuses on a specific medical procedure, less general than overall treatment.

experienced remedy relating to

Uses more formal language to describe the experience of a remedy.

FAQs

How can I use "was treated for" in a sentence?

Use "was treated for" to indicate that someone received medical care for a specific condition. For example, "She "was treated for" a broken arm" or "He "was treated for" the flu".

What are some alternatives to "was treated for"?

You can use alternatives like "received treatment for", "underwent therapy for", or "obtained medical assistance for", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was treated of" instead of "was treated for"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "was treated" is "for". "Was treated of" is grammatically incorrect. Always use ""was treated for"" when indicating the condition someone received treatment for.

What's the difference between "was treated for" and "was diagnosed with"?

"Was diagnosed with" indicates the identification of a disease or condition, while ""was treated for"" indicates that medical care was received to address that condition. You are diagnosed first, then treated.