was translated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was translated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been converted from one language to another in the past. Example: "The novel was translated from Spanish to English, making it accessible to a wider audience."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The scale was translated using the back-translation technique.

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

HURT was translated according to the Global Campaign's translation protocol.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

It was translated by Sondra Silverston.

The New Yorker

The play was translated into several languages.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was translated by Yuliana Kornyushko.

The Guardian

It was translated by Open Russia.

The Guardian

It was translated into English in 1968.

Independent

(This excerpt was translated from Cantonese).

The New York Times

Her book was translated into six languages.

The New York Times

It was translated into many languages.

The New York Times

It was translated into thirteen languages.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was translated", specify the original language and the target language to provide clarity and context. For example: "The book was translated from French into English".

Common error

Avoid using "was translated by" when the focus is on the translator's skill rather than the act of translation itself. Instead, use "translated by" to emphasize the translator's agency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was translated" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject underwent a translation process. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. The phrase highlights the action performed on the subject, rather than the actor performing the translation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

56%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was translated" is a grammatically sound and very common passive verb phrase that signifies the conversion of text or information from one language or format to another. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is correct and usable. Its neutral formality makes it appropriate for a range of contexts, particularly in science, news, and encyclopedic content. Usage involves clearly specifying the original and target languages to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases include "has been translated" and "was rendered". Overall, "was translated" serves as a crucial indicator of cross-lingual accessibility and adaptation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been translated

Indicates the translation occurred and continues to be relevant.

had been translated

Places the translation further in the past relative to another past event.

was rendered

Emphasizes the interpretation aspect of translation.

was adapted

Highlights changes made during the translation process to suit a new audience.

was converted

Focuses on the change of form or medium.

was interpreted

Suggests a more subjective understanding and conveyance of meaning.

was rewritten

Implies significant alterations during the translation process.

was put into

Simple way to indicate converting something into a certain language.

was reworded

Focuses on changes made on the choice of words.

was transcribed

Refers to changing spoken language into written form.

FAQs

How to use "was translated" in a sentence?

Use "was translated" to indicate that a text has been converted from one language to another. For example, "The article "was translated from Spanish" to English".

What can I say instead of "was translated"?

You can use alternatives like "was rendered", "was adapted", or "was converted" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was translated to" or "was translated into"?

While "was translated to" might be acceptable in some contexts, "was translated into" is generally preferred when referring to languages. For example, "The book "was translated into English"" is more common than "The book was translated to English".

What's the difference between "was translated" and "has been translated"?

"Was translated" indicates a completed action in the past, while "has been translated" implies that the translation was completed at some point in the past and remains in its translated state. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the completion of the action or the current state of the translated text.