Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was to be done

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was to be done" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe a task or duty that was previously intended or expected to be done. For example: "The project was to be completed yesterday, but there was a delay."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

What was to be done?

News & Media

The New York Times

What was to be done with them?

But what was to be done?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Besides, what was to be done?

But what was to be done with Luther?

Encyclopedias

Britannica

But what was to be done with this little prodigy?

The "job" was to be done by February 2005.

News & Media

The Guardian

What was to be done with it all?

But what was to be done with the territories won?

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

What is to be done about them?

News & Media

The New York Times

"When constabulary duty's to be done.

News & Media

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was to be done", ensure the context clearly indicates who was responsible for performing the action. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was to be done" when an active voice construction would be more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "The report was to be done by John", consider "John was to complete the report".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was to be done" primarily functions as a passive construction indicating a planned or scheduled action in the past. As Ludwig shows, it describes something that was intended or expected to occur. Examples demonstrate its use in specifying tasks, analyses, and actions that were part of a prior arrangement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Academia

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was to be done" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe actions or tasks that were planned or intended in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. While suitable for neutral and slightly formal communication, writers should consider whether an active voice construction might provide a more direct and impactful message. Common usage includes specifying planned activities and actions that were part of a schedule or expectation. Understanding its function and context can help writers effectively communicate past arrangements and intentions.

FAQs

How can I use "was to be done" in a sentence?

You can use "was to be done" to indicate a planned or scheduled action in the past. For instance, "The presentation "was to be done" on Friday, but it was postponed".

What are some alternatives to using "was to be done"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was intended to be carried out", "was supposed to be executed", or "was scheduled for completion", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "was to be done" formal or informal?

"Was to be done" is generally considered neutral to slightly formal. Its formality depends on the context; it is suitable for news reports, business communications, and academic papers. Using a more active construction may sometimes be more direct and preferable.

What's the difference between "was to be done" and "had to be done"?

"Was to be done" implies a plan or arrangement, while "had to be done" suggests a necessity or obligation. For example, "The task "was to be done" according to the schedule," versus "The task "had to be done" immediately to prevent further damage".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: