Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was thick with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was thick with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or environment that is filled with a particular substance or quality, often creating a strong or overwhelming presence. Example: "The air was thick with the scent of blooming flowers in the garden."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Everything was thick with dust.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The air was thick with incense.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The room was thick with cigarette smoke.

The air was thick with testosterone".

News & Media

The Guardian

The street was thick with pilgrims.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The Emirates air was thick with frustration.

His entire face was thick with paint.

The air was thick with the smell.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The air was thick with pride.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was thick with the Mermaid festival revelers.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It was winter in Pennsylvania and the ground was thick with snow.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was thick with" to vividly describe an atmosphere or environment, especially when conveying a sense of strong presence or saturation. For example, "The air was thick with anticipation" creates a more evocative image than "The air was full of anticipation".

Common error

Avoid using "was thick with" in contexts where a more precise or literal description would be more appropriate. For example, instead of saying "The report was thick with data", consider saying "The report contained a large amount of data" or "The report was data-heavy".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

92%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was thick with" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to describe its state. It indicates that something is saturated or abundant with a particular substance, quality, or emotion. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's a valid and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was thick with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to vividly describe an environment or atmosphere saturated with a particular substance, quality, or emotion. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While suitable for a wide range of contexts, it's particularly common in news and media. Alternatives such as "was filled with" or "was laden with" can be used depending on the desired nuance. When using it, it's important to consider if a more precise description would be appropriate in some situations.

FAQs

How can I use "was thick with" in a sentence?

Use "was thick with" to describe an environment or atmosphere saturated with a particular quality, substance, or emotion. For example: "The air "was thick with the smell of" pine needles" or "The room "was thick with tension"".

What are some alternatives to "was thick with"?

Some alternatives include "was filled with", "was heavy with", "was laden with", or "was saturated with". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was thick with" in formal writing?

Yes, "was thick with" is appropriate for formal writing, especially when aiming to create a vivid or descriptive effect. However, consider whether a more precise or literal alternative might be more suitable in certain contexts, especially scientific writing.

What is the difference between "was thick with" and "was full of"?

"Was thick with" often implies a denser or more intense presence than "was full of". While both phrases indicate abundance, "was thick with" suggests a more overwhelming or saturated state. For example, "The air "was thick with smoke"" suggests a more oppressive atmosphere than "The air "was full of smoke"".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

92%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: