Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was heavy with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was heavy with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, atmosphere, or feeling that is filled with a particular emotion or quality, often implying a sense of weight or significance. Example: "The air was heavy with anticipation as the crowd waited for the announcement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was heavy with gym-trained muscle.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The gathering was heavy with symbolism.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Traffic was heavy with commuters.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She was heavy with child.

The air was heavy with missed opportunity.

News & Media

The New York Times

His bandoleer was heavy with bullets.

News & Media

The New York Times

Nearby, Battery Park was heavy with history but otherwise empty.

News & Media

The New York Times

Everyone appeared casual, but the air was heavy with tension.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The air was heavy with sweet, rotting guavas.

I was heavy with the weight of it.

News & Media

The Guardian

Last year's Queen's speech was heavy with proposals on crime.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was heavy with", consider the connotations of 'heavy'. Is it meant to be oppressive, significant, or simply descriptive?

Common error

Avoid using "was heavy with" when simply describing physical weight. Opt for more direct phrases like "weighed a lot" or "was very heavy" for clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

93%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was heavy with" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun by describing its state or condition. It indicates that the noun is not just filled with something but also burdened or significantly affected by it, creating a sense of weight or importance. As Ludwig AI states, it is a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Science

3%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was heavy with" is a versatile phrase used to describe something burdened or filled with a particular quality. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and frequently encountered in diverse contexts, especially within news and media. The phrase conveys more than simple content; it implies a weight, burden, or significance carried by the subject. While appropriate for both physical and emotional contexts, avoid overusing it for literal descriptions of weight where simpler alternatives suffice. Remember to consider the connotations of "heavy" and choose accordingly to achieve the desired emotional effect. Related alternatives includes "was laden with", "was filled with", and "was saturated with".

FAQs

How can I use "was heavy with" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to describe something burdened or filled with a particular quality, emotion, or substance. For example, "The air "was heavy with" the smell of pine" or "Her heart "was heavy with" sorrow."

What are some alternatives to "was heavy with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was laden with", "was filled with", or "was saturated with" to express a similar meaning.

Is it more appropriate to use "was filled with" instead of "was heavy with"?

While both phrases can convey a sense of fullness, ""was heavy with"" often implies a burden or significance that "was filled with" may not. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to communicate.

Can "was heavy with" refer to both physical and emotional burdens?

Yes, this phrase is versatile and can be used in both contexts. For physical burdens, it might describe something literally weighty; for emotional burdens, it describes feelings of sadness, guilt, or stress.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

93%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: