Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was heavy with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was heavy with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, atmosphere, or feeling that is filled with a particular emotion or quality, often implying a sense of weight or significance. Example: "The air was heavy with anticipation as the crowd waited for the announcement."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It was heavy with gym-trained muscle.
News & Media
The gathering was heavy with symbolism.
News & Media
Traffic was heavy with commuters.
News & Media
She was heavy with child.
News & Media
The air was heavy with missed opportunity.
News & Media
His bandoleer was heavy with bullets.
News & Media
Nearby, Battery Park was heavy with history but otherwise empty.
News & Media
Everyone appeared casual, but the air was heavy with tension.
News & Media
The air was heavy with sweet, rotting guavas.
News & Media
I was heavy with the weight of it.
News & Media
Last year's Queen's speech was heavy with proposals on crime.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was heavy with", consider the connotations of 'heavy'. Is it meant to be oppressive, significant, or simply descriptive?
Common error
Avoid using "was heavy with" when simply describing physical weight. Opt for more direct phrases like "weighed a lot" or "was very heavy" for clarity.
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was heavy with" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun by describing its state or condition. It indicates that the noun is not just filled with something but also burdened or significantly affected by it, creating a sense of weight or importance. As Ludwig AI states, it is a correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
70%
Encyclopedias
15%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Science
3%
Academia
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was heavy with" is a versatile phrase used to describe something burdened or filled with a particular quality. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and frequently encountered in diverse contexts, especially within news and media. The phrase conveys more than simple content; it implies a weight, burden, or significance carried by the subject. While appropriate for both physical and emotional contexts, avoid overusing it for literal descriptions of weight where simpler alternatives suffice. Remember to consider the connotations of "heavy" and choose accordingly to achieve the desired emotional effect. Related alternatives includes "was laden with", "was filled with", and "was saturated with".
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was laden with
Replaces "heavy" with "laden", suggesting a strong sense of being burdened or filled to capacity.
was filled with
A more straightforward alternative, focusing on the state of being completely full of something.
was saturated with
Implies a complete permeation or infusion of something, often used for sensory experiences or emotions.
was imbued with
Suggests that something is deeply permeated or filled with a particular quality or characteristic.
was thick with
Indicates a high concentration or presence of something, often used for tangible or atmospheric elements.
was overflowing with
Emphasizes an abundance or excessive amount of something.
was abundant in
Highlights the presence of something in great quantity, emphasizing richness and availability.
was rich in
Indicates a high concentration of a particular element or quality, suggesting value or benefit.
was burdened by
Focuses on the negative aspect of carrying something heavy, highlighting the weight or difficulty.
was oppressed by
Suggests an overwhelming or burdensome presence of something, often with negative emotional or psychological implications.
FAQs
How can I use "was heavy with" in a sentence?
This phrase is used to describe something burdened or filled with a particular quality, emotion, or substance. For example, "The air "was heavy with" the smell of pine" or "Her heart "was heavy with" sorrow."
What are some alternatives to "was heavy with"?
Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was laden with", "was filled with", or "was saturated with" to express a similar meaning.
Is it more appropriate to use "was filled with" instead of "was heavy with"?
While both phrases can convey a sense of fullness, ""was heavy with"" often implies a burden or significance that "was filled with" may not. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to communicate.
Can "was heavy with" refer to both physical and emotional burdens?
Yes, this phrase is versatile and can be used in both contexts. For physical burdens, it might describe something literally weighty; for emotional burdens, it describes feelings of sadness, guilt, or stress.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested