was testimony enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was testimony enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether the evidence or statements provided were sufficient to support a claim or argument. Example: "In the trial, the jury deliberated whether the witness's account was testimony enough to convict the defendant."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

An eighth-grade boy in a Knicks cap asked me, "Do you believe what Charlie Ward said about us?" The look of hurt on his face was testimony enough against theological arrogance.

The New York Times

The impact of the opening chorus Herr, unser Herrscher, delivered by the joint forces of the Cantamus Chamber Choir, the Wiltshire Music Centre Chorus and choristers from St Laurence School with a considerable body of sound, was testimony enough to a worthy endeavour.

The Guardian - Music

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

This mundanity is testimony enough to the integration of voodoo, or vodoun, into daily life in Benin, the country that claims to have given birth to the religion.

The New York Times

But the mere fact that the chancellor who unified the country, Helmut Kohl, will not be here is testimony enough to the bittersweet nature of this celebration.

The New York Times

The crowds of customers that often spill out into the street at these two shops are testimony enough to their proprietors' skills.

The New York Times - Food

For those who know how grueling it can be to put together a prize-worthy project and devote hundreds of hours of "free" time at night, on weekends, during spring break and summer vacation, doing real, original scientific research while one's friends are busy adolescing, the achievement is testimony enough to Ms. Portman's self-discipline and drive.

The New York Times - Science

The resulting interpretation of Mr He's testimony was bad enough for the court to remark that "some portions of the transcript read like 'Who's on First.'" To its credit, the court recognized that "faulty or unreliable translations can undermine the evidence" on which a decision is based.It's great that the Ninth Circuit identified the problem.

The Economist

The weaker kind of probability is testimony.

SEP

I got–I'm testimony of it.

Forbes

This Supplement is testimony to their work.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

That alone is tribute and testimony enough.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was testimony enough", ensure the context clearly establishes what the testimony refers to and what it is intended to prove. This provides clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "was testimony enough" as a standalone statement without specifying whose testimony is being referenced and what it aims to prove. Without this context, the phrase can sound vague and unconvincing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was testimony enough" serves as a declarative statement. It asserts that the provided testimony met the necessary threshold to establish a fact or convince an audience. This aligns with the use in the provided examples from Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Academia

13%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was testimony enough" is grammatically correct and functions to express that a particular testimony was sufficient to prove a point or convince an audience. As evidenced by Ludwig, it is commonly found in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While versatile, ensure the context clearly establishes whose testimony is referenced and what it's meant to prove. Related phrases include "was sufficient evidence" and "was adequate proof", each offering slightly different nuances. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English when discussing the sufficiency of evidence or statements to support a claim or argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was sufficient evidence

Replaces "testimony" with the broader term "evidence", implying that the overall proof was adequate.

was adequate proof

Similar to 'sufficient evidence', but emphasizes the conclusiveness of the proof presented.

was conclusive evidence

Highlights that the evidence presented was definitive and left no room for doubt.

was proof enough

A more concise way of saying that the presented proof was adequate.

was sufficient to prove

Focuses on the action of proving, indicating the evidence met the required standard.

constituted sufficient evidence

Formal rephrasing using "constituted", indicating the evidence amounted to enough.

provided sufficient justification

Shifts the focus to justification, suggesting the evidence adequately supported a claim.

was ample demonstration

Uses 'ample' and 'demonstration' to emphasize a clear and abundant display of proof.

was a clear indication

Indicates that the testimony served as a strong sign or signal.

served as adequate confirmation

Highlights the role of the testimony in confirming something else, ensuring its validity.

FAQs

How can I use "was testimony enough" in a sentence?

You can use "was testimony enough" to indicate that a particular testimony or account was sufficient to prove a point or convince someone. For example, "In the trial, the victim's account "was testimony enough" to secure a conviction".

What are some alternatives to "was testimony enough"?

Alternatives include "was sufficient evidence", "was adequate proof", or "was conclusive evidence". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was testimony enough"?

Yes, the phrase "was testimony enough" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English to express that a certain testimony provided sufficient proof or evidence.

What's the difference between "was testimony enough" and "was evidence enough"?

"Was testimony enough" refers specifically to verbal or written statements as sufficient proof, while "was evidence enough" is a broader term that includes any form of evidence—documents, physical objects, or witness statements—that serves as sufficient proof. You can also use alternative phrases like "was adequate proof" or "was sufficient to prove".